Outcome of open versus laproscopic appendicectomy in department of surgery, lady reading hospital, Peshawar

ABSTRACT

To compare safety and benefits of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in a randomized control clinical trial. Between January 2008 and October 2009 one hundred and twenty patients [86 male and 34 female] with suspected acute appendicitis were assigned either to laparoscopic [n=60] or open [n=60] appendicectomy. Surgical technique was standardized for both laparoscopic and open procedure. The patients were analyzed in terms of the following aspects and findings; operation time, postoperative pain, intra and post operative complications, hospital stay and return to normal daily activities. There was no mortality. Wound infection [8.3%] and intra-abdominal abscess [11.6%] formation rate was significantly higher in open group than in the laparoscopic group [1.6%] and [3.3%] respectively. Postoperative pain scores [assessed by a pain distress variable, indicated on visual linear scale 0 to 10 and a pain activity scale, indicated on visual linear scale 0 to 10] was significantly lower in laparoscopic group. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in laparoscopic group [p<0.0353] and mean operation time was similar in both groups. One patient [1.6%] was converted from laparoscopic to open appendicectomy due to diffuse pelvic adhesions. Though operation time was same but complications, pain and hospital stay was less in the Laparoscopic group