Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative evaluation of three methods of diagnosis of schistosoma haematobium infection
Journal of the Faculty of Medicine-Baghdad. 1989; 31 (2): 221-225
in En | IMEMR | ID: emr-13328
Responsible library: EMRO
A total of 100 urine samples were examined for S. haematobium infection by filtration, centrifugation and sedimentation methods. A significantly higher proportion of S. haematobium-ova was detected by filtration method [34%] than by centrifugation [24%] and sedimentation [19%] methods, and a higher intensity of infection was detected by filtration method as well. All patients with heavy infection [>/= 50 eggs/10 ml urine] detected by filtration technique were also positive by the other methods, while only 50% and 25% of those with light infection[< 50 eggs/10 ml urine] were positive by centrifugation and sedimentation methods respectively
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Index: IMEMR Main subject: Comparative Study Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Language: En Journal: J. Fac. Med.-Baghdad Year: 1989
Search on Google
Index: IMEMR Main subject: Comparative Study Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Language: En Journal: J. Fac. Med.-Baghdad Year: 1989