Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Screening for HIV: can we afford the false negative rate
Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association [The]. 1989; 64 (3-4): 255-63
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-13360
ABSTRACT
False negative results by screening assays for HIV represent an important and serious concern. We have assayed fourty-three western-blot confirmed positive sera from North and East Africa by five HIV-1 screening assays, four ELISAs [Virgo, Behring, Dupont, and Organon] and a particle agglutination test [Serodia]. Results indicated low sensitivities, ranging from .77 - .86. Concordance of positive results by all five screening assays was complete in only 51%. However, only a small portion of the African sera was responsible for the majority of inaccurate and discordant results.In addition, if western blot positivity had been defined by more stingent criteria [i.e. presence of p31 reactivity], sensitivities of the screening assays would have increased dramatically
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Main subject: Mass Screening / False Negative Reactions Type of study: Screening study Language: English Journal: J. Egypt. Public Health Assoc. Year: 1989

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Main subject: Mass Screening / False Negative Reactions Type of study: Screening study Language: English Journal: J. Egypt. Public Health Assoc. Year: 1989