Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory and non-respiratory clinical specimens using the Cepheid Gene Xpert[registered sign] system
Saudi Medical Journal. 2012; 33 (10): 1100-1105
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-155976
ABSTRACT
To compare the sensitivity and specificity of Cepheid Gene Xpert[registered sign], MTB/RIF assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex [MTBC] and rifampin [RIF] resistance with conventional methods in respiratory and non-respiratory clinical specimens. We used a cross sectional design to evaluate a diagnostic test at the TB Section of the Division of Microbiology, Central Military Laboratory and Blood Bank, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia from October 2011 to January 2012. The detection of MTBC and RIF resistance using the Xpert[registered sign] MTB/RIF assay was assessed in 239 [172 respiratory, and 67 non respiratory] specimens received from 234 patients suspected of TB, and compared with conventional smear microscopy and culture methods. Out of the 239 specimens investigated, 62 [25.9%] were MTBC positive by culture, while 59 [24.6%] were positive by Xpert[registered sign] assay. Three samples showed false negative Xpert[registered sign] results. Compared with the culture, the Xpert[registered sign] assay achieved 95.4% [95% CI 89-100%] sensitivity, and 100% [95% CI 93.6-100%] specificity for respiratory samples, while the sensitivity for non-respiratory specimens was 94.4% [95% CI 90.2-98.5], and the specificity for non-respiratory specimens was 100% [95% CI 95.8-100%]. Overall, a 95.2% [95% CI 87.6-100] sensitivity, and 100% [95% CI 92.4-100%] specificity, was observed for the Xpert[registered sign] MTB/RIF assay compared with conventional methods for MTBC detection. The gene Xpert[registered sign] MTB/RIF assay is a helpful tool for the detection of MTBC and RIF resistance in respiratory and non-respiratory clinical samples with a high sensitivity and specificity within 2 hours as compared with conventional methods, which took a much longer time
Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Language: English Journal: Saudi Med. J. Year: 2012

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Language: English Journal: Saudi Med. J. Year: 2012