Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Evaluation of health, environmental, economic and technical aspects of disinfection of WWTP effluent in the north of Isfahan with UV instead of chlorine]
Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. 2011; 16 (4): 50-59
in Persian | IMEMR | ID: emr-162951
ABSTRACT
Today, chlorine is the most common material used for effluent disinfection. Chlorination is an established and effective method for effluent disinfection. But the use of chlorine for disinfection of effluent due to several major concerns should be reassessed. The aim of this study was to compare long-term benefits and costs of chlorination/de chlorination with those of UV by pilot studies. This pilot study consisted of pre-treatment units clarification and filtration systems with two types of low pressure and medium pressure UV lamps designed and installed at the wastewater treatment plant in the north of Isfahan. Medium pressure UV systems with dose of 230 mw.s/cm2 for disinfection of filtered effluent with SOR of 1090 lit/m2.hr is more economical than a low pressure system and chlorination/dechlorination process and has the least environmental and health adverse effects. In wastewater treatment plants use of UV disinfection technology should be considered in preference to chlorination, especially if the dechlorination of chlorinated effluent is required. Before application of this system pilot studies on actual effluent at plant sites are required
Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Type of study: Health economic evaluation Language: Persian Journal: Sci. J. Kurdistan Univ. Med. Sci. Year: 2011

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Type of study: Health economic evaluation Language: Persian Journal: Sci. J. Kurdistan Univ. Med. Sci. Year: 2011