Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement with the noncontact pulsair 3000 tonometer and goldmann applanation tonometer]
Bina Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009; 14 (4): 372-377
in Persian | IMEMR | ID: emr-165191
ABSTRACT
To compare intraocular pressure [IOP] measurement with Pulsair non-contact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer [GAT]. In this cross-sectional study, during a complete ophthalmologic examination, each patient underwent Pulsair tonometry three times at 5 minutes intervals and then Goldmann tonometry at the same intervals. Mean IOP values were measured and analyzed. We evaluated 458 eyes of 250 patients [138 males and 112 female subjects]. Mean IOP was 19.45 +/- 9.04 mmHg with GAT and 20.11 +/- 8.42 mmHg with Pulsair [P=0.075]. Correlation coefficient between the two methods was 0.96 [P= 0.004] and the mean difference [Pulsair-GAT] was 0.65 +/- 1.52 [confidence interval 95%, +3.5 to -2.29]. With IOPs between 10-25mmHg, mean difference between the two methods was 0.49 +/- 1.23 [P= 0.32] mmHg, however it was -1.75 +/- 1.91 [P= 0.06] at IOPs over than 25 mm Hg. Pulsair tonometry has acceptable accuracy in comparison with GAT, especially in IOP ranging from 10 to 25 mmHg
Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Language: Persian Journal: Bina J. Ophthalmol. Year: 2009

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Language: Persian Journal: Bina J. Ophthalmol. Year: 2009