Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of non-mesh [shouldice] versus mesh [lichtenstein] repair in inguinal hernia
Medical Forum Monthly. 2015; 26 (1): 38-40
in En | IMEMR | ID: emr-168193
Responsible library: EMRO
To evaluate the optimum method of repair for inguinal hernia with respect to low rate of recurrence, minimum postoperative pain and cost effectiveness. Retrospective and Comparative study. This study was conducted between 2004-2007 in the surgical department DHQ Hospital Karak from. Either 320 patients were randomly allotted to mesh or non-Mesh repair. They were followed up at the 1[st] week and then 1, 6,12,18,24 and 36[th] month. Clinical outcome that is, recurrence rate, quality of life, Post-oparative pain etc were noted. After 3 year, the recurrence rates were significantly different for the two types of repairs. The Shouldice is usually suited in primary and unilateral inguinal hernial repair in adult males. In addition, The Lichtenstein is best for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernial repair in old patients [>60 Yrs] and in elective states of repair
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Index: IMEMR Main subject: Pain, Postoperative / Surgical Mesh / Retrospective Studies / Cost-Benefit Analysis Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Med. Forum Mon. Year: 2015
Search on Google
Index: IMEMR Main subject: Pain, Postoperative / Surgical Mesh / Retrospective Studies / Cost-Benefit Analysis Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Med. Forum Mon. Year: 2015