Evaluation of medical education virtual program: P3 model
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism. 2016; 4 (4): 202-205
in En
| IMEMR
| ID: emr-184195
Responsible library:
EMRO
Introduction: In e-learning, people get involved in a process and create the content [product] and make it available for virtual learners. The present study was carried out in order to evaluate the first virtual master program in medical education at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences according to P3 Model
Methods: This is an evaluation research study with post single group design used to determine how effective this program was. All students 60 who participated more than one year in this virtual program and 21 experts including teachers and directors participated in this evaluation project. Based on the P3 e-learning model, an evaluation tool with 5-point Likert rating scale was designed and applied to collect the descriptive data
Results: Students reported storyboard and course design as the most desirable element of learning environment [2.30 +/- 0.76], but they declared technical support as the less desirable part [1.17 +/- 1.23]
Conclusion: Presence of such framework in this regard and using it within the format of appropriate tools for evaluation of e-learning in universities and higher education institutes, which present e-learning curricula in the country, may contribute to implementation of the present and future e-learning curricula efficiently and guarantee its implementation in an appropriate way
Methods: This is an evaluation research study with post single group design used to determine how effective this program was. All students 60 who participated more than one year in this virtual program and 21 experts including teachers and directors participated in this evaluation project. Based on the P3 e-learning model, an evaluation tool with 5-point Likert rating scale was designed and applied to collect the descriptive data
Results: Students reported storyboard and course design as the most desirable element of learning environment [2.30 +/- 0.76], but they declared technical support as the less desirable part [1.17 +/- 1.23]
Conclusion: Presence of such framework in this regard and using it within the format of appropriate tools for evaluation of e-learning in universities and higher education institutes, which present e-learning curricula in the country, may contribute to implementation of the present and future e-learning curricula efficiently and guarantee its implementation in an appropriate way
Search on Google
Index:
IMEMR
Type of study:
Evaluation_studies
Language:
En
Journal:
J. Adv. Med. Educ. Prof.
Year:
2016