<A> prospective, randomized study of periprostatic lignocaine injection versus intrarectal lignocaine or placebo gel for pain relief during transrectal ultrasound [TRUS] guided needle biopsy of the prostate

A., Naidoo; C.F., Heyns; N.A., Aziz; P.D., Theron; A.A., Botha

prospective, randomized study of periprostatic lignocaine injection versus intrarectal lignocaine or placebo gel for pain relief during transrectal ultrasound [TRUS] guided needle biopsy of the prostate

A., Naidoo; C.F., Heyns; N.A., Aziz; P.D., Theron; A.A., Botha.

African Journal of Urology. 2006; 12 (2): 65-74

in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-187253

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT

Objective:

The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and complications of periprostatic lignocaine injection with transrectal instillation of lignocaine gel or placebo for the relief of pain associated with transrectat ultrasound [TRUS] guided needle biopsy of the prostate

Subject(s)

Humans; Male; Prostate/diagnostic imaging; Pain Measurement; Lidocaine/administration & dosage; Injections/methods; Administration, Rectal; Comparative Study; Surveys and Questionnaires; Prospective Studies

Search on Google

XML

Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Main subject: Prostate / Administration, Rectal / Pain Measurement / Comparative Study / Prospective Studies / Surveys and Questionnaires / Injections / Lidocaine Limits: Humans / Male Language: English Journal: African J. Urol. Year: 2006

Similar

MEDLINE

LILACS

LIS

Search on Google

XML