Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surgical intervention versus endoscopy in the treatment of bile duct stones
Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine [The]. 2017; 68 (1): 829-836
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-189917
ABSTRACT
Bile duct stones [BDSs] may happen in up to 4%-15% of all patients for whom cholecystectomy is performed. Patients giving CBDS have manifestations including biliary colic, jaundice, cholangitis, pancreatitis or might be asymptomatic. It is critical to recognize essential and auxiliary stones, in light of the fact that the treatment approach shifts. Stones found some time recently, amid, and after cholecystectomy had likewise contrasting medicines. Distinctive strategies have been utilized for the treatment of CBDS yet the appropriate treatment relies on upon conditions, for example, quiet' fulfilment, number and size of stones, and the specialists involvement in laparoscopy. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with or without endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, laparoscopic CBD investigation [transcystic or transcholedochal], or laparotomy with CBD investigation [by T-tube, C-tube inclusion, or essential conclusion] are the most regularly utilized strategies overseeing CBDS [Common bile duct stones]. We will survey the pathophysiology of bile duct stones, finding, and distinctive procedures of treatment with particular concentrate on the different surgical modalities
Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Language: English Journal: Egypt. J. Hosp. Med. Year: 2017

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Language: English Journal: Egypt. J. Hosp. Med. Year: 2017