Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Indications, Complications and fetal outcomes-a comparison between emergency and elective cesarean sections
Specialist Quarterly. 1995; 11 (4): 277-282
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-39780
ABSTRACT
A comparison was made between emergency and elective caesarean sections regarding their indications, complications and fetal outcomes. This paper is based on two studies. During these studies 390 [19.70%] elective and 1589 [80.29%] emergency caesareans were done. Common indications for emergency were failure to progress 276 [17.36%], fetal distress 239 [15.04%] and CPD 201 [12.64%], while major indications for elective sections were breech presentation 94 [24.10%] and cases with previous 2 or more caesarean sections 86 [22.05%]. Complications like anaesthetic problems, bleeding and infection occurred more frequently in the emergency cases. There were 7 maternal deaths in emergency group while none in elective cases. There were 96 [6.04%] perinatal deaths in emergency cases as compared to l l [2.82%] in elective ones. Neonatal complications like asphyxia, birth trauma, infections and jaundice were more commonly found in the emergency cases
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Main subject: Pregnancy Complications / Fetal Death Language: English Journal: Specialist Q. Year: 1995

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Main subject: Pregnancy Complications / Fetal Death Language: English Journal: Specialist Q. Year: 1995