Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Benha Medical Journal. 1997; 14 (3): 375-384
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-44186
ABSTRACT
To compare the results of endometnial ablation [E.A.] vs. Resection [E.R] especially, recurrence of uterine bleeding. This study included 38 patients complaining from severe menorrhagia, dysfunctional uterine bleeding or simple endometirtal hyperplasia, was conducted from 1994 to August 1996. Endometrial ablation was done on 23 patients and resection on 15 patients. Benha university hospital and author's private practice. The mean operating time was shorter in ablation than in resection but [6 months] cumulative failure rate for resection was around 6.6% and 21% for ablation. Patients were very satisfied in 93% of resection and 78% in ablation Recurrence of uterine bleeding is less with endometrial resection
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Main subject: Uterine Hemorrhage / Comparative Study / Follow-Up Studies / Treatment Outcome / Endometrial Hyperplasia / Endometrium Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Benha Med. J. Year: 1997

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Main subject: Uterine Hemorrhage / Comparative Study / Follow-Up Studies / Treatment Outcome / Endometrial Hyperplasia / Endometrium Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Benha Med. J. Year: 1997