Laparoscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications

ABSTRACT

It is not clear whether the laparoscopic approach does decrease the incidence of postoperative infectious complications after appendectomy. One hundred twenty nine patients were randomized, 67 with laparoscopic [LA] and 62 with open appendectomy [OA]. Patients in the OA group had a Mc Burney incision, LA was performed in the Lithotomy position. Acute appendicitis was confirmed in 85 percent of patients. The appendix was perforated in 5 patients of the LA versus 2 of the OA group. No conversion to the open procedure was necessary. The median operating time was 35 minutes in the LA group and 31 minutes in the open group [P=0.58]. The median postoperative hospital stay was shorter after Laparoscopic than after open surgery [2 days versus 5 days P= 0.026], where as the time required for return to work was not significantly different [14 versus 15 days]. There were 5 [7.4 percent] patients with superficial wound infection following LA and 6 [9.6 percent] after OA [P=0.67]. Intra-abdominal fluid collections were found in 2 [2.9 percent] patients following LA and 3 [4.8 percent] patients following OA [P =0.60]. In the LA group, 3 patients presented with intra abdominal hemorrhage and another 3 developed a paralytic ileus that was treated conservatively. Laparoscopic appendectomy is as safe as and as effective as the open procedure, however it does not decrease the rate of postoperative infectious complications