Cervical lympho-venous shunt versus denver shunt in management of intractable ascites [analysis of 170 cases]

ABSTRACT

The present study was conducted on 170 patients with intractable ascites secondary to liver cirrhosis. The present study showed that both peritoneo-venous and lympho-venous shunts are technically simple procedures that could be done under local anesthesia in nearly similar time duration. However, Denver shunt is expensive, it costs between LE 4000-6000. Lympho-venous shunt is a biological cheap procedure. It can be concluded from this study that patients with intractable ascites could be offered surgical therapy with either shunts with a high success rate. Cervical lympho-venous shunt appears to be a simple, safe, cheap and effective method for achieving a long-term control of refractory ascites. The use of a biological shunt is an added advantage over prosthetic shunts for drainage of ascetic fluid with almost negligible complications. Failure does not interfere with the future use of the expensive peritoneo-venous Denver shunt. Denver peritoneo-venous shunt is a good device to relieve ascites, thereby reducing the risk of complications and the number of hospital admissions due to repeated paracentesis and consequently improving the quality of life. However, its high cost limits its wide scale application. A careful patient selection is mandatory for optimal results: