Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in morbidlty obese patients: a comparative study
Kasr El Aini Journal of Surgery. 2004; 5 (3): 131-137
in English
| IMEMR
| ID: emr-67190
ABSTRACT
To compare between laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding as regard the operative procedure, efficiency, clinical results and complications, in the treatment of morbid obesity A total of 40 morbidly obese patients, with body mass index [BMl] 40 to 50 kg/m[2] were selected to either laparoscopic adjustable silicone banding [LASGB] [n = 21 cases] or laparoscopic vertical banding gastroplasty [LVBG] [n 19 cases]. The patients were operated upon during the period between February 2000 to November 2001 with a follow up period of 24 months postoperatively There were no deaths in both groups but conversions to open surgery in one case in [LVBG]. Mean operative time was 94.2 minutes in [LVBG] versus 65.4 minutes in [LASGB] [P < 0.05] Early morbidity rate was lower in LASGB [6.1%] versus LVBG [9.8%]. Mean hospital stay was shorter in LASGB [3 days] versus LVBG [6 days [P < 0.05,]. Late complications in LVBG was 14% and in LASGB was 32.7% [P < 0.05]. The most frequent complication was slippage of the band [18%]. Late reoperations rate in LVBG was 0% versus 24.5% in LASGB [P < 0.001]. Weight loss in LVBG after 2 years was [63.5%], versus 41.4% in LASGB. BMI in L VBG at 2 years was 29.7 kg/m[2] versus 34.8kg/m[2] in LASGB. This study demonstrates that, in patients with BMI 40 to 50 kg/m[2], LASGB requires shorter operative time and hospital stay but LVGB is more effective in terms of late complications reoperations and weight loss
Search on Google
Index:
IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean)
Main subject:
Postoperative Complications
/
Body Mass Index
/
Treatment Outcome
/
Laparoscopy
/
Obesity
Limits:
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Language:
English
Journal:
Kasr El Aini J. Surg.
Year:
2004
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS