Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Comparison of ethanol, methanol and succinate effects as carbon sources on effluent biological denitrification]
Yafteh Journal. 2008; 10 (1): 63-70
in Persian | IMEMR | ID: emr-90777
ABSTRACT
Increase of nitrate concentration in water sources is becoming a serious problem in many parts of the world. Nitrogen containing compounds released into environment can create serious problems, such as eutrophication of water sources and hazard potential to human health, because it has potency of causing methemoglubinemia disease and cancer. Between recommended methods, biological denitrification is an effective method to remove nitrate from water and wastewater. In this study, biological nitrogen removal process was evaluated using ethanol, methanol and succinate as different organic carbon sources in batch scale. The different parameters, carbon source, initial nitrate concentration, pH, and inoculated of bacteria were evaluated. The experimental results were showed that bacteria can not use methanol as carbon source. The dinitrifyers bacteria can dissimilate 200 mg/L No3-N, in the optimum condition 28 °C, pH 7.2 and initial inoculation of 3x 10[8] CFU/ml, respectively. In the process, produced nitrate-N was less than 1 mg/I. The bacterium Pseudomonas stuizeri can use ethanol as carbon source for biological denitrification, but efficiency of succinate was better than ethanol
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Main subject: Carbon / Water / Waste Disposal, Fluid / Succinic Acid / Pseudomonas stutzeri / Nitrates Language: Persian Journal: Yafteh J. Year: 2008

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Main subject: Carbon / Water / Waste Disposal, Fluid / Succinic Acid / Pseudomonas stutzeri / Nitrates Language: Persian Journal: Yafteh J. Year: 2008