Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A newly designed partial subperiosteal implant and the classical design: a comparative study
P. R. health sci. j ; 13(3): 183-90, sept. 1994.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-176788
ABSTRACT
Seventy two partial subperiosteal implants were inserted in 52 patients. Thirty six of these implants had a classical design in which the submerged structure had thick primary and secondary connectors. Thirty six implants had a newly designed submerged structure consisting of long and thin primary connectors with grooves along their outer surfaces designed to stop or delay the downgrowth of epithelial mucosa. A six year evaluation revealed a 92.5 per cent success of the newly designed implants and an 84 per cent success for the classical design. A 10 year statistical projection revealed a 50 per cent cumulative success for the classical design and a 92.5 per cent success for the new

design:

Subject(s)
Search on Google
Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Dental Implants / Dental Implantation, Subperiosteal Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: P. R. health sci. j Journal subject: Medicine Year: 1994 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Dental Implants / Dental Implantation, Subperiosteal Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: P. R. health sci. j Journal subject: Medicine Year: 1994 Type: Article