Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: comparison of mannitol and sodium phosphate: results of a prospective randomized study
Habr-Gama, Angelita; Bringel, Robert William de Azevedo; Nahas, Sergio Carlos; Araújo, Sergio Eduardo de Alonso; Souza Junior, Afonso Henrique de; Calache, João Elias; Alves, Paulo Arruda.
  • Habr-Gama, Angelita; Universidade de Säo Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Divisäo de Coloproctologia.
  • Bringel, Robert William de Azevedo; Universidade de Säo Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Divisäo de Coloproctologia.
  • Nahas, Sergio Carlos; Universidade de Säo Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Divisäo de Coloproctologia.
  • Araújo, Sergio Eduardo de Alonso; Universidade de Säo Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Divisäo de Coloproctologia.
  • Souza Junior, Afonso Henrique de; Universidade de Säo Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Divisäo de Coloproctologia.
  • Calache, João Elias; Universidade de Säo Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Divisäo de Coloproctologia.
  • Alves, Paulo Arruda; Universidade de Säo Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Divisäo de Coloproctologia.
Rev. Hosp. Clin. Fac. Med. Univ. Säo Paulo ; 54(6): 187-92, Nov.-Dec. 1999. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-260495
ABSTRACT

METHOD:

Eighty patients were prospectively randomized for precolonoscopic cleansing either with 750ml of 10 percent mannitol (Group M) or 180ml of a sodium phosphate preparation (Group NaP). Laboratory examinations before and after preparation on all patients included hemoglobin, hematocrit, sodium, potassium, phosphorous, calcium and serum osmolarity. A questionnaire was used to assess undesirable side effects and patient tolerance to the solution. The quality of preparation was assessed by the endoscopist who was unaware of the solution employed.

RESULTS:

Statistically significant changes were verified in serum sodium, phosphorous, potassium and calcium between the two groups, but no clinical symptoms were observed. There were no significant differences in the frequency of side effects studied. Six of the eight patients in Group NaP who had taken mannitol for a previous colonoscopy claimed better acceptance of the sodium phosphate solution. The endoscopic-blinded trial reported excellent or good bowel preparation in 85 percent prepared with sodium phosphate versus 82.5 percent for mannitol (p=0.37).

CONCLUSIONS:

Quality of preparation and frequency of side effects was similar in the two solutions. The smaller volume of sodium phosphate necessary for preparation seems to be related to its favorable acceptance. Nevertheless, the retention of sodium and phosphate ions contraindicates the use of sodium phosphate in patients with renal failure, cirrhosis, ascites, and heart failure.
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Phosphates / Cathartics / Colonoscopy / Diuretics, Osmotic / Mannitol Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Observational study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Rev. Hosp. Clin. Fac. Med. Univ. Säo Paulo Journal subject: Medicine Year: 1999 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Phosphates / Cathartics / Colonoscopy / Diuretics, Osmotic / Mannitol Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Observational study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Rev. Hosp. Clin. Fac. Med. Univ. Säo Paulo Journal subject: Medicine Year: 1999 Type: Article