Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An improved method for concentrating rotavirus from water samples
Kittigul, Leera; Khamoun, Porntip; Sujirarat, Dusit; Utrarachkij, Fuangfa; Chitpirom, Kitja; Chaichantanakit, Nattasai; Vathanophas, Kanda.
  • Kittigul, Leera; Mahidol University. Faculty of Public Health. Department of Microbiology. Bangkok. TH
  • Khamoun, Porntip; Mahidol University. Faculty of Public Health. Department of Microbiology. Bangkok. TH
  • Sujirarat, Dusit; Mahidol University. Faculty of Public Health. Department of Epidemiology. Bangkok. TH
  • Utrarachkij, Fuangfa; Mahidol University. Faculty of Public Health. Department of Microbiology. Bangkok. TH
  • Chitpirom, Kitja; Mahidol University. Faculty of Public Health. Department of Microbiology. Bangkok. TH
  • Chaichantanakit, Nattasai; Mahidol University. Faculty of Public Health. Department of Microbiology. Bangkok. TH
  • Vathanophas, Kanda; Mahidol University. Faculty of Public Health. Department of Microbiology. Bangkok. TH
Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz ; 96(6): 815-821, Aug. 2001. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-298608
ABSTRACT
A modified adsorption-elution method for the concentration of seeded rotavirus from water samples was used to determine various factors which affected the virus recovery. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect the rotavirus antigen after concentration. Of the various eluents compared, 0.05M glycine, pH 11.5 gave the highest rotavirus antigen recovery using negatively charged membrane filtration whereas 2.9 percent tryptose phosphate broth containing 6 percent glycine; pH 9.0 was found to give the greatest elution efficiency when a positively charged membrane was used. Reconcentration of water samples by a speedVac concentrator showed significantly higher rotavirus recovery than polyethylene glycol precipitation through both negatively and positively charged filters (p-value <0.001). In addition, speedVac concentration using negatively charged filtration resulted in greater rotavirus recovery than that using positively charged filtration (p-value = 0.004). Thirty eight environmental water samples were collected from river, domestic sewage, canals receiving raw sewage drains, and tap water collected in containers for domestic use, all from congested areas of Bangkok. In addition, several samples of commercial drinking water were analyzed. All samples were concentrated and examined for rotavirus antigen. Coliforms and fecal coliforms (0->1,800 MPN/100 ml) were observed but rotavirus was not detected in any sample. This study suggests that the speedVac reconcentration method gives the most efficient rotavirus recovery from water samples
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Water Microbiology / Rotavirus Type of study: Diagnostic study Language: English Journal: Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz Journal subject: Tropical Medicine / Parasitology Year: 2001 Type: Article Affiliation country: Thailand Institution/Affiliation country: Mahidol University/TH

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Water Microbiology / Rotavirus Type of study: Diagnostic study Language: English Journal: Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz Journal subject: Tropical Medicine / Parasitology Year: 2001 Type: Article Affiliation country: Thailand Institution/Affiliation country: Mahidol University/TH