Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Limited-sampling strategy models for estimating the pharmacokinetic parameters of 4-methylaminoantipyrine, an active metabolite of dipyrone
Suarez-Kurtz, G; Ribeiro, F. M; Estrela, R. C. E; Vicente, F. L; Struchiner, C. J.
  • Suarez-Kurtz, G; Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Coordenaçäo de Pesquisa. Divisäo de Farmacologia. Rio de Janeiro. BR
  • Ribeiro, F. M; Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Coordenaçäo de Pesquisa. Divisäo de Farmacologia. Rio de Janeiro. BR
  • Estrela, R. C. E; Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Coordenaçäo de Pesquisa. Divisäo de Farmacologia. Rio de Janeiro. BR
  • Vicente, F. L; Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Coordenaçäo de Pesquisa. Divisäo de Farmacologia. Rio de Janeiro. BR
  • Struchiner, C. J; Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Coordenaçäo de Pesquisa. Divisäo de Farmacologia. Rio de Janeiro. BR
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 34(11): 1475-1485, Nov. 2001. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-303318
RESUMO
Bioanalytical data from a bioequivalence study were used to develop limited-sampling strategy (LSS) models for estimating the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) and the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of 4-methylaminoantipyrine (MAA), an active metabolite of dipyrone. Twelve healthy adult male volunteers received single 600 mg oral doses of dipyrone in two formulations at a 7-day interval in a randomized, crossover protocol. Plasma concentrations of MAA (N = 336), measured by HPLC, were used to develop LSS models. Linear regression analysis and a "jack-knife" validation procedure revealed that the AUC0- and the Cmax of MAA can be accurately predicted (R²>0.95, bias <1.5 percent, precision between 3.1 and 8.3 percent) by LSS models based on two sampling times. Validation tests indicate that the most informative 2-point LSS models developed for one formulation provide good estimates (R²>0.85) of the AUC (0-infinity) or Cmax for the other formulation. LSS models based on three sampling points (1.5, 4 and 24 h), but using different coefficients for AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax, predicted the individual values of both parameters for the enrolled volunteers (R²>0.88, bias = -0.65 and -0.37 percent, precision = 4.3 and 7.4 percent) as well as for plasma concentration data sets generated by simulation (R²>0.88, bias = -1.9 and 8.5 percent, precision = 5.2 and 8.7 percent). Bioequivalence assessment of the dipyrone formulations based on the 90 percent confidence interval of log-transformed AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax provided similar results when either the best-estimated or the LSS-derived metrics were used
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Dipyrone Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Observational study / Prevalence study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Braz. j. med. biol. res Journal subject: Biology / Medicine Year: 2001 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Instituto Nacional de Câncer/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Dipyrone Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Observational study / Prevalence study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Braz. j. med. biol. res Journal subject: Biology / Medicine Year: 2001 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Instituto Nacional de Câncer/BR