Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Seguimiento de un grupo de pacientes con desfibrilador automßtico implantable / Follow-up of a group of patients with automatic implantable defibrillator
González, Celso Mendonza; Torres, Pedro Iturralde; Valdivia, Milton E. Guevara; Domingo, Argelia Medeiros; Chßvez, Laura Rodríguez; Briones, Ignacio Rodriguez; Lizalde, Luis Colin.
  • González, Celso Mendonza; Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chßvez. Departamento de Arritmias. MX
  • Torres, Pedro Iturralde; Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Departamento de Arritmias. MX
  • Valdivia, Milton E. Guevara; Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Departamento de Arritmias. MX
  • Domingo, Argelia Medeiros; Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Departamento de Arritmias. MX
  • Chßvez, Laura Rodríguez; Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Departamento de Arritmias. MX
  • Briones, Ignacio Rodriguez; Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Departamento de Arritmias. MX
  • Lizalde, Luis Colin; Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Departamento de Arritmias. MX
Arch. cardiol. Méx ; 72(3): 220-226, jul.-set. 2002.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-329827
RESUMO
The automatic implantable defibrillator (AID) is the treatment of choice for primary and secondary prevention of sudden death. At the Instituto Nacional de CardiologÝa, since October 1996 until January 2002, 25 patients were implanted with 26 AID. There were 23 men (92) and the mean age of the whole group, was 51.4 years. Twenty-three patients (92) presented structural heart disease, the most common was ischemic heart disease in 13 patients (52), with a mean ejection fraction of 37.8. One patient without structural heart disease had Brugada Syndrome. The most frequent clinical arrhythmia was ventricular tachycardia in 14 patients (56). The mean follow-up was of 29.3 months during which a total of 30 events of ventricular arrhythmia were treated through AID; six of them were inappropriate due to paroxismal atrial fibrillation; 10 AID patients (34) have not applied for therapy. Three patients (12) of the group died due to congestive heart failure refractory to pharmacologic treatment.

CONCLUSION:

The implant of the AID is a safe and effective measure for primary and secondary prevention of sudden death. World-wide experience evidences, that this kind of device has not modified the mortality rate due to heart failure in these patients, but it has diminished sudden arrhythmic death.
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Arrhythmias, Cardiac / Defibrillators, Implantable Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: Spanish Journal: Arch. cardiol. Méx Journal subject: Cardiology Year: 2002 Type: Article Affiliation country: Mexico Institution/Affiliation country: Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chßvez/MX / Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez/MX

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Arrhythmias, Cardiac / Defibrillators, Implantable Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: Spanish Journal: Arch. cardiol. Méx Journal subject: Cardiology Year: 2002 Type: Article Affiliation country: Mexico Institution/Affiliation country: Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chßvez/MX / Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez/MX