Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The reliability of the Brazilian version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1)
Quintana, M. I; Andreoli, S. B; Jorge, M. R; Gastal, F. L; Miranda, C. T.
  • Quintana, M. I; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Departamento de Psiquiatria. São Paulo. BR
  • Andreoli, S. B; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Departamento de Psiquiatria. Núcleo de Estatística e Metodologia Aplicada. São Paulo. BR
  • Jorge, M. R; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Departamento de Psiquiatria. São Paulo. BR
  • Gastal, F. L; Universidade Católica de Pelotas. Escola de Medicina. Pelotas. BR
  • Miranda, C. T; Pan American Health Organization. Division of Mental Health. Washington. US
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 37(11): 1739-1745, Nov. 2004. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-385878
ABSTRACT
The objective of the present study was to determine the reliability of the Brazilian version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 2.1 (CIDI 2.1) in clinical psychiatry. The CIDI 2.1 was translated into Portuguese using WHO guidelines and reliability was studied using the inter-rater reliability method. The study sample consisted of 186 subjects from psychiatric hospitals and clinics, primary care centers and community services. The interviewers consisted of a group of 13 lay and three non-lay interviewers submitted to the CIDI training. The average interview time was 2 h and 30 min. General reliability ranged from kappa 0.50 to 1. For lifetime diagnoses the reliability ranged from kappa 0.77 (Bipolar Affective Disorder) to 1 (Substance-Related Disorder, Alcohol-Related Disorder, Eating Disorders). Previous year reliability ranged from kappa 0.66 (Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder) to 1 (Dissociative Disorders, Maniac Disorders, Eating Disorders). The poorest reliability rate was found for Mild Depressive Episode (kappa = 0.50) during the previous year. Training proved to be a fundamental factor for maintaining good reliability. Technical knowledge of the questionnaire compensated for the lack of psychiatric knowledge of the lay personnel. Inter-rater reliability was good to excellent for persons in psychiatric practice.
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / Interview, Psychological / Mental Disorders Type of study: Diagnostic study / Practice guideline / Qualitative research Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Braz. j. med. biol. res Journal subject: Biology / Medicine Year: 2004 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil / United States Institution/Affiliation country: Pan American Health Organization/US / Universidade Católica de Pelotas/BR / Universidade Federal de São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / Interview, Psychological / Mental Disorders Type of study: Diagnostic study / Practice guideline / Qualitative research Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Braz. j. med. biol. res Journal subject: Biology / Medicine Year: 2004 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil / United States Institution/Affiliation country: Pan American Health Organization/US / Universidade Católica de Pelotas/BR / Universidade Federal de São Paulo/BR