Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preliminary experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy through duplication of the open technique
Tobias-Machado, M; Lasmar, Marco T. C; Medina, Jimmy J. A; Forseto Júnior, Pedro H; Juliano, Roberto V; Wroclawski, Eric R.
  • Tobias-Machado, M; ABC Medical School. Section of Urology. Santo Andre. BR
  • Lasmar, Marco T. C; ABC Medical School. Section of Urology. Santo Andre. BR
  • Medina, Jimmy J. A; ABC Medical School. Section of Urology. Santo Andre. BR
  • Forseto Júnior, Pedro H; ABC Medical School. Section of Urology. Santo Andre. BR
  • Juliano, Roberto V; ABC Medical School. Section of Urology. Santo Andre. BR
  • Wroclawski, Eric R; ABC Medical School. Section of Urology. Santo Andre. BR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 31(3): 228-235, May-June 2005. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-411097
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe surgical and functional results with extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with duplication of the open technique, from the experience obtained in the treatment of 28 initial cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a 36-month period, we prospectively analyzed 28 patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer undergoing extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Mean surgical time was 280 min, with mean blood loss of 320 mL. As intraoperative complications, there were 2 rectal lesions repaired with laparoscopic suture in 2 planes. There was no conversion to open surgery. Median hospital stay was 3 days, with return to oral diet in the first post-operative day in patients. As post-operative complications, there were 3 cases of extraperitoneal urinary fistula. Two of these cases were resolved by maintaining a Foley catheter for 21 days, and the other one by late endoscopic reintervention for repositioning the catheter. Five out of 18 previously potent patients evolved with erectile dysfunction. The diagnosis of prostate cancer was confirmed in all patients, with focal positive margin occurring in 3 cases. During a mean follow-up of 18 months, 2 patients presented increased PSA, with no clinical evidence of disease. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a laborious and difficult procedure, with a long learning curve. Extraperitoneal access is feasible, and it is possible to practically duplicate the principles of open surgery. The present technique can possibly offer advantages in terms of decreased blood loss, preservation of erectile function and prevention of positive margins.
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prostatectomy / Prostatic Neoplasms / Adenocarcinoma / Endoscopy Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Aged / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2005 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: ABC Medical School/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prostatectomy / Prostatic Neoplasms / Adenocarcinoma / Endoscopy Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Aged / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2005 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: ABC Medical School/BR