Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Decision support system for the diagnosis of schizophrenia disorders
Razzouk, D; Mari, J. J; Shirakawa, I; Wainer, J; Sigulem, D.
  • Razzouk, D; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. Departamento de Psiquiatria. São Paulo. BR
  • Mari, J. J; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. Departamento de Psiquiatria. São Paulo. BR
  • Shirakawa, I; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. Departamento de Psiquiatria. São Paulo. BR
  • Wainer, J; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. Departamento de Informática Médica. São Paulo. BR
  • Sigulem, D; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. Departamento de Informática Médica. São Paulo. BR
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 39(1): 119-128, Jan. 2006. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-419149
RESUMO
Clinical decision support systems are useful tools for assisting physicians to diagnose complex illnesses. Schizophrenia is a complex, heterogeneous and incapacitating mental disorder that should be detected as early as possible to avoid a most serious outcome. These artificial intelligence systems might be useful in the early detection of schizophrenia disorder. The objective of the present study was to describe the development of such a clinical decision support system for the diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SADDESQ). The development of this system is described in four stages: knowledge acquisition, knowledge organization, the development of a computer-assisted model, and the evaluation of the system's performance. The knowledge was extracted from an expert through open interviews. These interviews aimed to explore the expert's diagnostic decision-making process for the diagnosis of schizophrenia. A graph methodology was employed to identify the elements involved in the reasoning process. Knowledge was first organized and modeled by means of algorithms and then transferred to a computational model created by the covering approach. The performance assessment involved the comparison of the diagnoses of 38 clinical vignettes between an expert and the SADDESQ. The results showed a relatively low rate of misclassification (18-34%) and a good performance by SADDESQ in the diagnosis of schizophrenia, with an accuracy of 66-82%. The accuracy was higher when schizophreniform disorder was considered as the presence of schizophrenia disorder. Although these results are preliminary, the SADDESQ has exhibited a satisfactory performance, which needs to be further evaluated within a clinical setting.
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Schizophrenia / Expert Systems / Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted / Decision Support Systems, Clinical Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Screening study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. j. med. biol. res Journal subject: Biology / Medicine Year: 2006 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal de São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Schizophrenia / Expert Systems / Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted / Decision Support Systems, Clinical Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Screening study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. j. med. biol. res Journal subject: Biology / Medicine Year: 2006 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal de São Paulo/BR