Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Management of rectal injury during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
Castillo, Octavio A; Bodden, Elias; Vitagliano, Gonzalo.
  • Castillo, Octavio A; Clinica Santa Maria. Department of Urology. Section of Endourology and Laparoscopic Urology. Santiago. CL
  • Bodden, Elias; Clinica Santa Maria. Department of Urology. Section of Endourology and Laparoscopic Urology. Santiago. CL
  • Vitagliano, Gonzalo; Clinica Santa Maria. Department of Urology. Section of Endourology and Laparoscopic Urology. Santiago. CL
Int. braz. j. urol ; 32(4): 428-433, July-Aug. 2006. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-436886
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Because laparoscopic radical prostatectomy remains a challenging procedure, rectal injury is always a potential complication. We review the incidence of rectal injuries at our institution in the first 110 consecutive laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomies. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Nine (8 percent) out of the first 110 laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomies performed between December 2001 and February 2004, were complicated by rectal injury. Mean patient age was 64.9 years (range 52 to 74) and mean prostate specific antigen was 11.45 ng/mL (range 4.8 to 37.4). Median preoperative Gleason score was 6 (range 4 to 8) and clinical stage was T1c, T2a, T2b in 6, 2 and 1 patient, respectively. Mean operative time was 228 minutes (range 150 to 300).

RESULTS:

From 9 injuries, 6 were diagnosed and repaired intraoperatively and 3 were diagnosed postoperatively. From the 6 cases of intraoperative diagnosis and repair, 3 patients healed primarily without colostomy and a recto-urinary fistula was evidenced by pneumaturia in the remaining three. These 3 patients were managed conservatively with urethral catheterization during 30 days. One of the patients required secondary fistula repair by anterior transphincteric, transanal surgical approach (ASTRA). Urinary fistula was diagnosed postoperatively on 3 patients. A diverting colostomy was performed on one patient with secondary fistula repair by ASTRA. Another patient required laparotomy due to peritonitis and urinary fistula was later managed with ASTRA. On the third patient conservative management with urethral catheter was successful. All fistulas repaired with ASTRA evolved uneventfully. There was no perioperative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS:

Rectal injury during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy can be managed intraoperatively or by a minimally invasive procedure without the need of colostomy. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a challenging procedure and is associated with a very flat flat learning curve; the incidence of rectal injuries is prone to diminish with experience.
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prostatectomy / Rectum / Rectal Fistula / Laparoscopy Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Risk factors Limits: Aged / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2006 Type: Article Affiliation country: Chile Institution/Affiliation country: Clinica Santa Maria/CL

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prostatectomy / Rectum / Rectal Fistula / Laparoscopy Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Risk factors Limits: Aged / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2006 Type: Article Affiliation country: Chile Institution/Affiliation country: Clinica Santa Maria/CL