Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pelvic floor exercises with biofeedback for stress urinary incontinence
Capelini, Maria V; Riccetto, Cassio L; Dambros, Miriam; Tamanini, Jose T; Herrmann, Viviane; Muller, Virginia.
  • Capelini, Maria V; State University of Campinas. Division of Urology and Gynecology. Campinas. BR
  • Riccetto, Cassio L; State University of Campinas. Division of Urology and Gynecology. Campinas. BR
  • Dambros, Miriam; State University of Campinas. Division of Urology and Gynecology. Campinas. BR
  • Tamanini, Jose T; State University of Campinas. Division of Urology and Gynecology. Campinas. BR
  • Herrmann, Viviane; State University of Campinas. Division of Urology and Gynecology. Campinas. BR
  • Muller, Virginia; State University of Campinas. Division of Urology and Gynecology. Campinas. BR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 32(4): 462-469, July-Aug. 2006. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-436894
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Prospective study to objectively evaluate the benefits of pelvic floor strengthening exercises associated to biofeedback for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Fourteen patients diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were selected for this study. All patients underwent a pelvic floor training associated to biofeedback for 12 consecutive weeks. Urodynamic tests, pad test and bladder diary were analyzed at the beginning of the study, at the end and after 3 months. The King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) was applied before and after treatment to assess the impact in the quality of life.

RESULTS:

There was a significant reduction in the pad weight (from 14.21 g to 1 g), number of urinary leakage episodes (from 8.14 per day to 2.57 per day) and daytime frequency (from 7.93 per day to 5.85 per day). At urodynamics the authors observed a significant increase in Valsalva leak-point pressure (from 103.93 cm H2O to 139.14 cm H2O), cistometric capacity (from 249.29 mL to 336.43 mL, p = 0.0015) and bladder volume at first desire to void (from 145 mL to 215.71 mL). Those differences were kept during the first 3 months of follow up. The KHQ revealed significant differences except in the case of "general health perception", which covers health in general and not exclusively urinary incontinence.

CONCLUSION:

Treatment of SUI with pelvic floor exercises associated to biofeedback caused significant changes in the parameters analyzed, with maintenance of good results 3 months after treatment.
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Quality of Life / Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Biofeedback, Psychology / Pelvic Floor / Exercise Therapy Type of study: Evaluation studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2006 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: State University of Campinas/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Quality of Life / Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Biofeedback, Psychology / Pelvic Floor / Exercise Therapy Type of study: Evaluation studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2006 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: State University of Campinas/BR