O papel do acúmulo de colágeno no interstício miocárdico na sobrevida dos pacientes com cardiomiopatia dilatada idiopática e chagásica / The role of storage of interstitial myocardial collagen on the overlife rate of patients with idiopathic and chagasic dilated cardiomyopathy

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a correlação entre um marcador estrutural do miocárdio e a sobrevida dos pacientes com cardiomiopatia dilatada. MÉTODOS: Mediante realização da biópsia endomiocárdica e exame ecocardiográfico foram estudados 9 indivíduos sem doença estrutural miocárdica (controle) e 45 pacientes com cardiomiopatia dilatada grave de etiologia idiopática (MCDI) e chagásica (MCDC). Foi analisada a correlação entre a quantidade de colágeno miocárdico intersticial (FVCI) e a sobrevida desses pacientes, se a FVCI diferia entre as etiologias, e se a fibrose interferia na função e geometria do miocárdio. RESULTADOS: Foi observado que a FVCI foi 15 vezes maior nos cardiomiopatas em relação ao grupo-controle, mas não diferiu em relação às MCDI e MCDC (*p < 0,001). Não houve correlação da FCVI com a sobrevida dos pacientes com cardiomiopatias (MCDI p = 0,249 e na MCDC p = 0,587) e apenas na MCDI a fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo teve correlação com a FVCI. O diâmetro diastólico final do ventrículo esquerdo não se correlacionou com a FCVI nas duas etiologias. CONCLUSÃO: A fibrose miocárdica não diferiu entre as duas etiologias, não se correlacionou com o prognóstico das MCDC e MCDI e apenas na MCDI ela se correlacionou com a FEVE.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To find out whether there is a correlation between a myocardial structural marker and the overlife rate of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Using endomyocardial biopsy and 2D-echocardiogram, we studied nine patients with no changes in myocardial structure (control) and 45 patients with severe dilated cardiomyopathy of idiopathic etiology (IDCM) and of Chagasic etiology (CDCM). We analyzed the correlation between the quantity of interstitial myocardial collagen (ICVF) and the overlife rates of these patients. We also evaluated the difference in ICVF between these groups and whether fibrosis interfered on the geometry and function of the myocardium. RESULTS: We observed that ICVF was 15 times higher in cardiomyopathy patients than in the control group, but there was no difference in ICVF between CDCM and IDCM (*p < 0.001) patients. There was no correlation between ICVF and the overlife rate in cardiomyopathy patients (IDCM p = 0.249, and CDCM p = 0.587). We observed a significant correlation between ICVF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) only for IDCM. There was no correlation between ICVF and left ventricular diastolic diameter in either etiology. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in myocardial fibrosis between patients with CDCM or IDCM, and there was no correlation between fibrosis and the prognosis either for IDCM or CDCM. There was a correlation between myocardial fibrosis and LVEF only for IDCM.