Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Desensitizing bioactive agents improves bond strength of indirect resin-cemented restorations: preliminary results
Pires-de-Souza, Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri; Marco, Fabíola Fiorezi de; Casemiro, Luciana Assirati; Panzeri, Heitor.
  • Pires-de-Souza, Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Marco, Fabíola Fiorezi de; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Casemiro, Luciana Assirati; University of Franca. Franca. BR
  • Panzeri, Heitor; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics. Ribeirão Preto. BR
J. appl. oral sci ; 15(2): 120-126, Mar.-Apr. 2007. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-452768
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to assess the bond strength of indirect composite restorations cemented with a resin-based cement associated with etch-and-rinse and self-etching primer adhesive systems to dentin treated or not with a bioactive material. MATERIALS AND

METHOD:

Twenty bovine incisor crowns had the buccal enamel removed and the dentin ground flat. The teeth were assigned to 4 groups (n=5) Group I acid etching + Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply); Group II application of a bioactive glass (Biosilicato®)+ acid etching + Prime & Bond NT; Group III One-up Bond F (J Morita); Group IV Biosilicato® + One-up Bond F. Indirect composite resin (Artglass, Kulzer) cylinders (6x10mm) were fabricated and cemented to the teeth with a dual-cure resin-based cement (Enforce, Dentsply). After cementation, the specimens were stored in artificial saliva at 37°C for 30 days and thereafter tested in tensile strength in a universal testing machine (EMIC) with 50 kgf load cell at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Failure modes were assessed under scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test (95 percent level of confidence).

RESULTS:

Groups I, II and III had statistically similar results (p>0.05). Group IV had statistically significant higher bond strength means (p<0.05) than the other groups. The analysis of the debonded surfaces showed a predominance of adhesive failure mode for Group III and mixed failure mode for the other groups.

CONCLUSION:

The use of desensitizing agent did not affect negatively the bonding of the indirect composite restorations to dentin, independently of the tested adhesive systems.
Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2007 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of Franca/BR / University of São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2007 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of Franca/BR / University of São Paulo/BR