Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Why are the rates of cesarean section in Brazil higher in more developed cities than in less developed ones?
Ribeiro, V. S; Figueiredo, F. P; Silva, A. A. M; Bettiol, H; Batista, R. F. L; Coimbra, L. C; Lamy, Z. C; Barbieri, M. A.
  • Ribeiro, V. S; Universidade Federal do Maranhão. Departamento de Medicina III. São Luís. BR
  • Figueiredo, F. P; Universidade Federal do Maranhão. Departamento de Saúde Pública. São Luís. BR
  • Silva, A. A. M; Universidade Federal do Maranhão. Departamento de Saúde Pública. São Luís. BR
  • Bettiol, H; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Puericultura e Pediatria. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Batista, R. F. L; Universidade Federal do Maranhão. Departamento de Saúde Pública. São Luís. BR
  • Coimbra, L. C; Universidade Federal do Maranhão. Departamento de Enfermagem. São Luís. BR
  • Lamy, Z. C; Universidade Federal do Maranhão. Hospital Universitário. São Luís. BR
  • Barbieri, M. A; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Puericultura e Pediatria. Ribeirão Preto. BR
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 40(9): 1211-1220, Sept. 2007. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-460893
ABSTRACT
The objective of the present study was to investigate factors associated with cesarean sections in two cities located in different regions of Brazil and to determine factors that explain the higher cesarean section rate in the more developed city, Ribeirão Preto, compared to the less developed one, São Luís. Data from two cohort studies comprising 2846 women in Ribeirão Preto in 1994, and 2443 women in São Luís in 1997/1998 were used. Adjusted and non-adjusted risk estimates were calculated using a Poisson regression model. The cesarean section rate was 33.7 percent in São Luís and 50.8 percent in Ribeirão Preto. Adjusted analysis in a joint sequential model revealed a 51 percent higher risk of cesarean section in Ribeirão Preto compared to São Luís (prevalence rate ratio (PRR) = 1.51). Adjustment for category of hospital admission reduced the PRR to 1.09, i.e., this variable explained 82 percent of the difference in the cesarean section rate between the two cities. Adjustment for the variable "the same physician for prenatal care and delivery" reduced the PRR to 1.07, with the "physician" factor explaining 86 percent of the difference between rates. When simultaneously adjusted for the two variables, the PRR decreased to 1.05, with these two variables explaining 90 percent of the difference in the cesarean section rate between the two cities, and the difference was no longer significant. The difference in the cesarean section rate between the two Brazilian cities, one more and one less developed, was mainly explained by the physician factor and, to a lesser extent, by the category of hospital admission.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Cesarean Section Type of study: Etiology study / Incidence study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Braz. j. med. biol. res Journal subject: Biology / Medicine Year: 2007 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal do Maranhão/BR / Universidade de São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Cesarean Section Type of study: Etiology study / Incidence study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Braz. j. med. biol. res Journal subject: Biology / Medicine Year: 2007 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal do Maranhão/BR / Universidade de São Paulo/BR