Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adhesives with different pHs: effect on the MTBS of chemically activated and light-activated composites to human dentin
Mallmann, André; Melo, Renata Marques de; Estrela, Verbênia; Pelogia, Fernanda; Campos, Laura; Bottino, Marco Antonio; Valandro, Luiz Felipe.
  • Mallmann, André; Foundation for Science Development. School of Dentistry. Salvador. BR
  • Melo, Renata Marques de; São Paulo State University. Dental School of São José dos Campos. São José dos Campos. BR
  • Estrela, Verbênia; s.af
  • Pelogia, Fernanda; São Paulo State University. Dental School of São José dos Campos. São José dos Campos. BR
  • Campos, Laura; s.af
  • Bottino, Marco Antonio; São Paulo State University. Dental School of São José dos Campos. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics. São José dos Campos. BR
  • Valandro, Luiz Felipe; University of Santa Maria. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Division of Prosthodontics. Santa Maria. BR
J. appl. oral sci ; 15(4): 265-269, July-Aug. 2007. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-463676
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the bond strength between human dentin and composites, using two light-activated single-bottle total-etch adhesive systems with different pHs combined with chemically activated and light-activated-composites. The tested hypothesis was that the dentin bond strength is not influenced by an adhesive system of low pH, combined with chemically activated or light-activated composites. MATERIAL AND

METHOD:

Flat dentin surfaces of twenty-eight human third molars were allocated in 4 groups (n=7), depending on the adhesive system (One Step Plus-OS and Prime & Bond NT-PB) and composite (light-activated Filtek Z-100 [Z100] and chemically activated Bisfil 2B [B2B]). Each adhesive system was applied on acid-etched dentin and then one of the composites was added to form a 5 mm-high resin block. The specimens were stored in tap water (37°C/24 h) and sectioned into two axes, x and y. This was done with a diamond disk under coolant irrigation to obtain beams with a cross-section area of approximately 0.8 mm². Each specimen was then attached to a custom-made device and submitted to the microtensile test (1 mm.min-1). Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (p<0.05).

RESULTS:

The anticipated hypothesis was not confirmed (p<0.0001). The bond strengths (MPa) were not statistically different between the two adhesive systems when light-activated composite was used (OS+Z100 = 24.7±7.1ª; PB+Z100 = 23.8±5.7ª). However, with use of the chemically activated composite (B2B), PB (7.8±3.6b MPa) showed significantly lower dentin bond strengths than OS (32.2±7.6ª).

CONCLUSION:

The low pH of the adhesive system can affect the bond of chemically activated composite to dentin. On the other hand, under the present conditions, the low pH did not seem to affect the bond of light-activated composites to dentin significantly.

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2007 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Foundation for Science Development/BR / São Paulo State University/BR / University of Santa Maria/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2007 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Foundation for Science Development/BR / São Paulo State University/BR / University of Santa Maria/BR