Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preoperative determination of prostate cancer tumor volume: analysis through biopsy fragments
Antunes, Alberto A; Srougi, Miguel; Dall'oglio, Marcos F; Crippa, Alexandre; Nesrallah, Adriano J; Nesrallah, Luciano J; Leite, Katia R.
  • Antunes, Alberto A; University of Sao Paulo. Medical School. Division of Urology. São Paulo. BR
  • Srougi, Miguel; University of Sao Paulo. Medical School. Division of Urology. São Paulo. BR
  • Dall'oglio, Marcos F; University of Sao Paulo. Medical School. Division of Urology. São Paulo. BR
  • Crippa, Alexandre; University of Sao Paulo. Medical School. Division of Urology. São Paulo. BR
  • Nesrallah, Adriano J; University of Sao Paulo. Medical School. Division of Urology. São Paulo. BR
  • Nesrallah, Luciano J; University of Sao Paulo. Medical School. Division of Urology. São Paulo. BR
  • Leite, Katia R; University of Sao Paulo. Medical School. Division of Urology. São Paulo. BR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 33(4): 477-485, July-Aug. 2007. ilus, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-465783
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Preoperative determination of prostate cancer (PCa) tumor volume (TV) is still a big challenge. We have assessed variables obtained in prostatic biopsy aiming at determining which is the best method to predict the TV in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Biopsy findings of 162 men with PCa submitted to radical prostatectomy were revised. Preoperative characteristics, such as PSA, the percentage of positive fragments (PPF), the total percentage of cancer in the biopsy (TPC), the maximum percentage of cancer in a fragment (MPC), the presence of perineural invasion (PNI) and the Gleason score were correlated with postoperative surgical findings through an univariate analysis of a linear regression model.

RESULTS:

The TV correlated significantly to the PPF, TPC, MPC, PSA and to the presence of PNI (p < 0.001). However, the Pearson correlation analysis test showed an R2 of only 24 percent, 12 percent, 17 percent and 9 percent for the PPF, TPC, MPC, and PSA respectively. The combination of the PPF with the PSA and the PNI analysis showed to be a better model to predict the TV (R2 of 32.3 percent). The TV could be determined through the formula Volume = 1.108 + 0.203 x PSA + 0.066 x PPF + 2.193 x PNI.

CONCLUSIONS:

The PPF seems to be better than the TPC and the MPC to predict the TV in the surgical specimen. Due to the weak correlation between those variables and the TV, the PSA and the presence of PNI should be used together.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Biopsy, Needle / Preoperative Care / Tumor Burden Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2007 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of Sao Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Biopsy, Needle / Preoperative Care / Tumor Burden Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2007 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of Sao Paulo/BR