Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Volumetric polymerization shrinkage of contemporary composite resins
Nagem Filho, Halim; Nagem, Haline Drumond; Francisconi, Paulo Afonso Silveira; Franco, Eduardo Batista; Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia; Coutinho, Kennedy Queiroz.
  • Nagem Filho, Halim; University of São Paulo. Bauru School of Dentistry. Department Dental Materials. Bauru. BR
  • Nagem, Haline Drumond; University of São Paulo. Bauru School of Dentistry. Department Dental Materials. Bauru. BR
  • Francisconi, Paulo Afonso Silveira; University of São Paulo. Bauru School of Dentistry. Department Dental Materials. Bauru. BR
  • Franco, Eduardo Batista; University of São Paulo. Bauru School of Dentistry. Department Operative Dentistry. Bauru. BR
  • Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia; University of São Paulo. Bauru School of Dentistry. Department Operative Dentistry. Bauru. BR
  • Coutinho, Kennedy Queiroz; School of Dentistry San Lucas. Department Operative Dentistry.
J. appl. oral sci ; 15(5): 448-452, Sept.-Oct. 2007. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-465929
ABSTRACT
The polymerization shrinkage of composite resins may affect negatively the clinical outcome of the restoration. Extensive research has been carried out to develop new formulations of composite resins in order to provide good handling characteristics and some dimensional stability during polymerization. The purpose of this study was to analyze, in vitro, the magnitude of the volumetric polymerization shrinkage of 7 contemporary composite resins (Definite, Suprafill, SureFil, Filtek Z250, Fill Magic, Alert, and Solitaire) to determine whether there are differences among these materials. The tests were conducted with precision of 0.1 mg. The volumetric shrinkage was measured by hydrostatic weighing before and after polymerization and calculated by known mathematical equations. One-way ANOVA (ß=0.05) was used to determine statistically significant differences in volumetric shrinkage among the tested composite resins. Suprafill (1.87±0.01) and Definite (1.89±0.01) shrank significantly less than the other composite resins. SureFil (2.01±0.06), Filtek Z250 (1.99±0.03), and Fill Magic (2.02±0.02) presented intermediate levels of polymerization shrinkage. Alert and Solitaire presented the highest degree of polymerization shrinkage. Knowing the polymerization shrinkage rates of the commercially available composite resins, the dentist would be able to choose between using composite resins with lower polymerization shrinkage rates or adopting technical or operational procedures to minimize the adverse effects deriving from resin contraction during light-activation.

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2007 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2007 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of São Paulo/BR