Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of a 1-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes
Campos, M. A. A; Reichelt, A. A. J; Façanha, C; Forti, A. C; Schmidt, M. I.
  • Campos, M. A. A; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Faculdade de Medicina. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Reichelt, A. A. J; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Façanha, C; Secretaria da Saúde do Estado do Ceará. Centro de Diabetes e Hipertensão. Fortaleza. BR
  • Forti, A. C; Secretaria da Saúde do Estado do Ceará. Centro de Diabetes e Hipertensão. Fortaleza. BR
  • Schmidt, M. I; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Faculdade de Medicina. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia. Porto Alegre. BR
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 41(8): 684-688, Aug. 2008. graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-491917
ABSTRACT
In order to evaluate the performance of a 1-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a cohort of 4998 women, 20 years or older, without previous diabetes being treated in prenatal care clinics in Brazil answered a questionnaire and performed a 75-g OGTT including fasting, 1-h and 2-h glucose measurements between their 24th and 28th gestational weeks. Pregnancy outcomes were transcribed from medical registries. GDM was defined according to WHO criteria (fasting greater than or equal to 126 mg/dL; 2-h value greater than or equal to 140 mg/dL) and macrosomia as a birth weight equal to or higher than 4000 g. Areas under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) were compared and diagnostic properties of various cut-off points were evaluated. The AUCs for the prediction of macrosomia were 0.606 (0.572-0.637) for the 1-h and 0.589 (0.557-0.622) for the 2-h plasma glucose test. Similar predictability was demonstrable regarding combined adverse

outcomes:

0.582 (0.559-0.604) for the 1-h test and 0.572 (0.549-0.595) for the 2-h test. When the 1-h glucose test was evaluated against a diagnosis of GDM defined by the 2-h glucose test, the AUC was 0.903 (0.886-0.919). The cut-off point that maximized sensitivity (83%) and specificity (83%) was 141 mg/dL, identifying 21% of the women as positive. A cut-off point of 160 mg/dL, with lower sensitivity (62%), had higher specificity (94%), labeling 8.6% as positive. Detection of GDM can be done with a 1-h 75-g OGTT the value of 160 mg/dL has the same diagnostic performance as the conventional 2-h value (140 mg/dL). The simplification of the test may improve coverage and timing of the diagnosis of GDM.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Diabetes, Gestational / Glucose Tolerance Test Type of study: Diagnostic study / Etiology study / Evaluation studies / Incidence study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors / Screening study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: English Journal: Braz. j. med. biol. res Journal subject: Biology / Medicine Year: 2008 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre/BR / Secretaria da Saúde do Estado do Ceará/BR / Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Diabetes, Gestational / Glucose Tolerance Test Type of study: Diagnostic study / Etiology study / Evaluation studies / Incidence study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors / Screening study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: English Journal: Braz. j. med. biol. res Journal subject: Biology / Medicine Year: 2008 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre/BR / Secretaria da Saúde do Estado do Ceará/BR / Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul/BR