Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic techniques in live donor nephrectomy
Branco, Anibal Wood; Kondo, William; Branco Filho, Alcides José; George, Marco Aurélio de; Rangel, Marlon; Stunitz, Luciano Carneiro.
  • Branco, Anibal Wood; Red Cross Hospital. Department of Urology. Curitiba. BR
  • Kondo, William; Red Cross Hospital. Curitiba. BR
  • Branco Filho, Alcides José; Red Cross Hospital. Curitiba. BR
  • George, Marco Aurélio de; Red Cross Hospital. Curitiba. BR
  • Rangel, Marlon; Red Cross Hospital. Curitiba. BR
  • Stunitz, Luciano Carneiro; Red Cross Hospital. Department of Urology. Curitiba. BR
Clinics ; 63(6): 795-800, 2008. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-497893
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy techniques in live donor nephrectomy.

METHODS:

In this retrospective study, we included all patients submitted to hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy between May 2002 and December 2007. The operative data and post-operative courses were reviewed. Information was collected on the operative time, warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, intra-operative complications, time to first oral intake, length of hospital stay, and post-operative complications. The data were analyzed using Student's t -tests and Fisher exact tests as appropriate, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05.

RESULTS:

The means of the operative duration, warm ischemia time and intra-operative bleeding were 83 min, 3.6 min and 130.9 cc, respectively, for hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, and 78.4 min, 2.5 min and 98.9 cc, respectively, for pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (p=0.29, p<0.0001 and p=0.08, respectively). Intra-operative complications occurred in 6 percent of patients submitted to hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and in 4.5 percent of those submitted to pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (p=0.68). Only one patient from each group required conversion to open surgery; one person receiving hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy had bleeding and one person receiving pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy had low carbon dioxide levels during the warm ischemia period. Compared with patients receiving hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, patients submitted to pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy were able to take their first meal earlier (12.5 vs. 9.2 hours, p=0.046), were discharged home sooner (2.8 vs. 1.4 days, p<0.0001) and had fewer post-operative complications (7.5 percent vs. 0.6 percent, p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS:

Pure laparoscopic live...
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Laparoscopy / Living Donors / Tissue and Organ Harvesting / Nephrectomy Type of study: Observational study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Clinics Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2008 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Red Cross Hospital/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Laparoscopy / Living Donors / Tissue and Organ Harvesting / Nephrectomy Type of study: Observational study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Clinics Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2008 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Red Cross Hospital/BR