Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of lyophilized bovine bone biocompatibility
Galia, Carlos Roberto; Macedo, Carlos Alberto; Rosito, Ricardo; Mello, Tielle Muller de; Camargo, Lourdes Maria Araújo Quaresma; Moreira, Luis Fernando.
  • Galia, Carlos Roberto; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. School of Medicine. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Macedo, Carlos Alberto; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. School of Medicine. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Rosito, Ricardo; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. School of Medicine. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Mello, Tielle Muller de; Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. School of Biological Sciences. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Camargo, Lourdes Maria Araújo Quaresma; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Tissue Bank. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Moreira, Luis Fernando; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. School of Medicine. Porto Alegre. BR
Clinics ; 63(6): 801-806, 2008. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-497894
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The use of bone grafts in orthopedic, maxillofacial and dental surgery has been growing. Nevertheless, both fresh autografts and frozen allografts have limitations, and therefore, alternative synthetic or natural biomaterials, such as processed and lyophilized bovine bone graft have been developed.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of lyophilized bovine bone manufactured in a semi-industrial scale, according to a modifical protocol developed by the authors.

METHODS:

Samples of bovine cancellous bone were processed according to a protocol developed by Kakiuchi et al., and modified to process samples of bovine cancellous bone. The following trials were performed in vitro cytotoxicity, in vivo acute systemic toxicity, in vivo oral irritation potential, in vitro pyrogenic reaction, and bioburden.

RESULTS:

The in vitro evaluation of lyophilized bovine cancellous bone revealed an absence of cytotoxicity in 100 percent of the samples. Regarding in vivo evaluation of acute systemic toxicity, neither macroscopic abnormalities nor deaths were noted in the animals. Pyrogenicity was not greater than 0.125 UE/ml in any of the samples. The bioburden revealed negative results for microbial growth before sterilization. Regarding the oral irritation potential, in vivo evaluation at 24 and 72 hours showed that the animals had no edema or erythema on the oral mucosa.

CONCLUSION:

The protocol changes established by the authors to prepare lyophilized bovine cancellous bone at a semi-industrial scale is reproducible and yielded a product with excellent biocompatibility.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Materials Testing / Bone Substitutes Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Clinics Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2008 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre/BR / Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul/BR / Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Materials Testing / Bone Substitutes Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Clinics Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2008 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre/BR / Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul/BR / Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul/BR