Patient's reactions to digital rectal examination of the prostate
Int. braz. j. urol
;
34(5): 572-576, Sept.-Oct. 2008. ilus, tab
Article
in English
| LILACS
| ID: lil-500392
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
In recent years, there has been a rise in the incidence of prostate cancer (PCa), and routine screening for the disease has become a well accepted clinical practice. Even with the recognized benefit of this approach, some men are still reluctant to undergo digital rectal examination (DRE). For this reason, we designed the present study in order to better understand men's reactions about this method of screening. The aim was to identify possible drawbacks that could be overcome to increase DRE. MATERIALS ANDMETHODS:
We randomly selected 269 patients that were enrolled in an institutional PCa screening program. They were first asked to answer a question regarding their preferred position to undergo the examination. Following this step, they answered a questionnaire in which physical and psychological reactions regarding the DRE were presented. Finally, we used a visual analogical scale (VAS) to analyze the perception of pain during DRE.RESULTS:
The supine position was preferred for most patients (53.9 percent). Before DRE, about 59.4 percent of patients felt that the exam would be acceptable. After DRE, this figure increased to 91.5 percent (p < 0.001). Mean VAS score during DRE was 1.69 on a scale with a range between 0 and 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = extreme pain).CONCLUSION:
Patient expectations about DRE were negative before examination and changed significantly following the exam. Pain during examination was negligible, contrary to the prevalent belief. These two findings must be clearly presented to patients in order to improve PCa screening acceptance.
Full text:
Available
Index:
LILACS (Americas)
Main subject:
Posture
/
Prostatic Neoplasms
/
Digital Rectal Examination
Type of study:
Prognostic study
/
Qualitative research
Limits:
Aged
/
Aged80
/
Humans
/
Male
Language:
English
Journal:
Int. braz. j. urol
Journal subject:
Urology
Year:
2008
Type:
Article
Affiliation country:
Brazil
Institution/Affiliation country:
University of Sao Paulo/BR
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS