Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Topographic distribution of the tibial somatosensory evoked potential using coherence
Melges, D. B; Infantosi, A. F. C; Miranda de Sá, A. M. F. L.
  • Melges, D. B; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto Alberto Luiz Coimbra de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa de Engenharia. Programa de Engenharia Biomédica. Rio de Janeiro. BR
  • Infantosi, A. F. C; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto Alberto Luiz Coimbra de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa de Engenharia. Programa de Engenharia Biomédica. Rio de Janeiro. BR
  • Miranda de Sá, A. M. F. L; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto Alberto Luiz Coimbra de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa de Engenharia. Programa de Engenharia Biomédica. Rio de Janeiro. BR
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 41(12): 1059-1066, Dec. 2008. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-502149
ABSTRACT
The objective of the present study was to determine the adequate cortical regions based on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) recording. This investigation was carried out using magnitude-squared coherence (MSC), a frequency domain objective response detection technique. Electroencephalographic signals were collected (International 10-20 System) from 38 volunteers, without history of neurological pathology, during somatosensory stimulation. Stimuli were applied to the right posterior tibial nerve at the rate of 5 Hz and intensity slightly above the motor threshold. Response detection was based on rejecting the null hypothesis of response absence (significance level α= 0.05 and M = 500 epochs). The best detection rates (maximum percentage of volunteers for whom the response was detected for the frequencies between 4.8 and 72 Hz) were obtained for the parietal and central leads mid-sagittal and ipsilateral to the stimulated leg C4 (87 percent), P4 (82 percent), Cz (89 percent), and Pz (89 percent). The P37-N45 time-components of the SEP can also be observed in these leads. The other leads, including the central and parietal contralateral and the frontal and fronto-polar leads, presented low detection capacity. If only contralateral leads were considered, the centro-parietal region (C3 and P3) was among the best regions for response detection, presenting a correspondent well-defined N37; however, this was not observed in some volunteers. The results of the present study showed that the central and parietal regions, especially sagittal and ipsilateral to the stimuli, presented the best SNR in the gamma range. Furthermore, these findings suggest that the MSC can be a useful tool for monitoring purposes.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Tibial Nerve / Brain Mapping / Cerebral Cortex / Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. j. med. biol. res Journal subject: Biology / Medicine Year: 2008 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Tibial Nerve / Brain Mapping / Cerebral Cortex / Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. j. med. biol. res Journal subject: Biology / Medicine Year: 2008 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro/BR