Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Variable positive end-expiratory pressure can maintain oxygenation in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by oleic acid in dogs
Lanza, F. C; Damasceno, M. C. P; Leme, F; Yagui, A. C. Z; Paiva, K. C; Luque, A; Beppu, O. S.
  • Lanza, F. C; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina. Disciplina de Pneumologia. São Paulo. BR
  • Damasceno, M. C. P; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina. Disciplina de Pneumologia. São Paulo. BR
  • Leme, F; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina. Disciplina de Pneumologia. São Paulo. BR
  • Yagui, A. C. Z; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina. Disciplina de Pneumologia. São Paulo. BR
  • Paiva, K. C; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina. Disciplina de Pneumologia. São Paulo. BR
  • Luque, A; Centro Universitário São Camilo. São Paulo. BR
  • Beppu, O. S; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina. Disciplina de Pneumologia. São Paulo. BR
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 42(8): 731-737, Aug. 2009. graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-520777
ABSTRACT
The use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or lung recruitment maneuvers (RM) to improve oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is used but it may reduce cardiac output (CO). Intermittent PEEP may avoid these complications. Our objective was to determine if variable PEEP compared with constant PEEP is capable of maintaining arterial oxygenation and minimizing hemodynamic alterations with or without RM. Eighteen dogs with ARDS induced by oleic acid were randomized into three equal groups: group 1, low variable PEEP; group 2, high variable PEEP, and group 3, RM + high variable PEEP. All groups were submitted to constant PEEP, followed by variable PEEP (PEEP was increased from 5 to 10 cmH2O in group 1, and from 5 to 18 cmH2O in the other two groups). PaO2 was higher in group 3 (356.2 ± 65.4 mmHg) than in group 1 (92.7 ± 29.7 mmHg) and group 2 (228.5 ± 72.4 mmHg), P < 0.05. PaO2 was maintained during variable PEEP except in group 2 (318.5 ± 82.9 at constant PEEP to 228.5 ± 72.4 at variable PEEP). There was a reduction in CO in group 3 after RM (3.9 ± 1.1 before to 2.7 ± 0.5 L·min-1·(m2)-1 after; P < 0.05), but there was not any difference between constant and variable PEEP periods (2.7 ± 0.5 and 2.4 ± 0.7 L·min-1·(m2)-1; P > 0.05. Variable PEEP is able to maintain PaO2 when performed in combination with RM in dogs with ARDS. After RM, CO was reduced and there was no relevant difference between the variable and constant PEEP periods.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Oxygen / Respiratory Distress Syndrome / Blood Pressure / Respiratory Mechanics / Positive-Pressure Respiration Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Braz. j. med. biol. res Journal subject: Biology / Medicine Year: 2009 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Centro Universitário São Camilo/BR / Universidade Federal de São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Oxygen / Respiratory Distress Syndrome / Blood Pressure / Respiratory Mechanics / Positive-Pressure Respiration Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Braz. j. med. biol. res Journal subject: Biology / Medicine Year: 2009 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Centro Universitário São Camilo/BR / Universidade Federal de São Paulo/BR