Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of temporary cements on the shear bond strength of luting cements
Fiori-Júnior, Marco; Matsumoto, Wilson; Silva, Raquel Assed Bezerra; Porto-Neto, Sizenando Toledo; Silva, Jaciara Miranda Gomes.
  • Fiori-Júnior, Marco; University of São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto Dental School. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Matsumoto, Wilson; University of São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto Dental School. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Silva, Raquel Assed Bezerra; University of São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto Dental School. Department of Pediatric Clinics, Preventive and Community Dentistry. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Porto-Neto, Sizenando Toledo; São Paulo State University. Araraquara Dental School. Department of Operative Dentistry. Araraquara. BR
  • Silva, Jaciara Miranda Gomes; University of São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto Dental School. Preventive and Community Dentistry. Department of Pediatric Clinics. Ribeirão Preto. BR
J. appl. oral sci ; 18(1): 30-36, Jan.-Feb. 2010. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-545024
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate, by shear bond strength (SBS) testing, the influence of different types of temporary cements on the final cementation using conventional and self-etching resin-based luting cements. Material and

Methods:

Forty human teeth divided in two halves were assigned to 8 groups (n=10) I and V (no temporary cementation); II and VI Ca(OH)2-based cement; III and VII zinc oxide (ZO)-based cement; IV and VIII ZO-eugenol (ZOE)-based cement. Final cementation was done with RelyX ARC cement (groups I to IV) and RelyX Unicem cement (groups V to VIII). Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5 percent significance level.

RESULTS:

Means were (MPa) I - 3.80 (±1.481); II - 5.24 (±2.297); III - 6.98 (±1.885); IV - 6.54 (±1.459); V - 5.22 (±2.465); VI - 4.48 (±1.705); VII - 6.29 (±2.280); VIII - 2.47 (±2.076). Comparison of the groups that had the same temporary cementation (Groups II and VI; III and VII; IV and VIII) showed statistically significant difference (p<0.001) only between Groups IV and VIII, in which ZOE-based cements were used. The use of either Ca(OH)2-based (Groups II and VI) or ZO-based (Groups III and VII) cements showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) for the different luting cements (RelyX TM ARC and RelyX TM Unicem). The groups that had no temporary cementation (Groups I and V) did not differ significantly from each other either (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION:

When temporary cementation was done with ZO- or ZOE-based cements and final cementation was done with RelyX ARC, there was an increase in the SBS compared to the control. In the groups cemented with RelyX Unicem, however, the use of a ZOE-based temporary cement affected negatively the SBS of the luting agent used for final cementation.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Dental Bonding / Dental Cements Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2010 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: São Paulo State University/BR / University of São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Dental Bonding / Dental Cements Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2010 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: São Paulo State University/BR / University of São Paulo/BR