Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of IFAT, ELISA, direct parasitological examination and PCR on lymph node aspirates for canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis
Camargo, J. B; Langoni, H; Troncarelli, M. Z; Machado, J. G; Lucheis, S. B; Padovani, C. R.
  • Camargo, J. B; Universidade Estadual Paulista. School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry. Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health. Botucatu. BR
  • Langoni, H; Universidade Estadual Paulista. School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry. Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health. Botucatu. BR
  • Troncarelli, M. Z; Universidade Estadual Paulista. School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry. Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health. Botucatu. BR
  • Machado, J. G; Universidade Estadual Paulista. School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry. Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health. Botucatu. BR
  • Lucheis, S. B; Universidade Estadual Paulista. School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry. Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health. Botucatu. BR
  • Padovani, C. R; Universidade Estadual Paulista. Botucatu Bioscience Institute. Department of Biostatistics. Botucatu. BR
J. venom. anim. toxins incl. trop. dis ; 16(3): 414-420, 2010. ilus, graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-557169
ABSTRACT
Canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is endemic in numerous Brazilian regions. The greatest difficulty in controlling the disease is the diagnostic limitation. In the present study, the most common tests employed for visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis were compared immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT), immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA), direct parasitological examination and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Samples of lymph node aspirates and blood were collected from 100 dogs that lived in an endemic area (Bauru city, São Paulo state) and from 100 negative controls from a non-endemic area (Botucatu city, São Paulo state). Specificity of both IFAT and PCR was 100 percent whereas ELISA was 99 percent. Sensitivities were 97.77, 93.33 and 91.11 percent respectively for IFAT, ELISA and PCR.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Leishmaniasis, Visceral Type of study: Diagnostic study Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: J. venom. anim. toxins incl. trop. dis Journal subject: Toxicology Year: 2010 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Estadual Paulista/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Leishmaniasis, Visceral Type of study: Diagnostic study Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: J. venom. anim. toxins incl. trop. dis Journal subject: Toxicology Year: 2010 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Estadual Paulista/BR