Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ System
Câmara, Andréa Cruz; Albuquerque, Miracy Muniz de; Aguiar, Carlos Menezes; Correia, Ana Cristina Regis de Barros.
  • Câmara, Andréa Cruz; Federal University of Pernambuco. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences. BR
  • Albuquerque, Miracy Muniz de; Federal University of Pernambuco. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences. BR
  • Aguiar, Carlos Menezes; Federal University of Pernambuco. Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. BR
  • Correia, Ana Cristina Regis de Barros; Federal University of Pernambuco. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 9(3): 402-409, July-Sept. 2010. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-578064
ABSTRACT

Aim:

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of 0.2%, 1%, and2% chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ system.

Methods:

Fifty human mandibular premolar teeth were infected with a mixture of Candida albicans,Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. The specimens were randomly divided into 5 groups with 10 root canals according to the irrigant used. All root canals were instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ system. Assessment of the antimicrobial action of the irrigant was performed before, during, and after instrumentation. Data were analyzed statistically by Chi-squared test and the Fisher exact test at 5% significance level.

Results:

The0.2% chlorhexidine solution was ineffective against all test microorganisms. The 1% chlorhexidinesolution was effective in eliminating P. aeruginosa and C. albicans after the use of the F1 and F3instruments, respectively. The 2% chlorhexidine solution was effective at killing S. aureus, P.aeruginosa and C. albicans after the use of the S1 instrument. There were statistically significant differences (p<0.05) between the concentrations of chlorhexidine and the instruments used.

Conclusions:

The 0.2% chlorhexidine solution in combination with rotary instrumentation was ineffective against all test microorganisms. The 1% chlorhexidine solution was ineffective against S. aureus and E. faecalis. The 2% chlorhexidine solution was not sufficient to inactivate E.faecalis.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Root Canal Irrigants / In Vitro Techniques / Chlorhexidine / Root Canal Preparation / Dental Pulp Cavity / Disinfectants Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2010 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Federal University of Pernambuco/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Root Canal Irrigants / In Vitro Techniques / Chlorhexidine / Root Canal Preparation / Dental Pulp Cavity / Disinfectants Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2010 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Federal University of Pernambuco/BR