Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Crown dimensions and proximal enamel thickness of mandibular second bicuspids
Fernandes, Sérgio Augusto; Vellini-Ferreira, Flávio; Scavone-Junior, Helio; Ferreira, Rívea Inês.
  • Fernandes, Sérgio Augusto; University of São Paulo City. Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics. São Paulo. BR
  • Vellini-Ferreira, Flávio; University of São Paulo City. Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics. São Paulo. BR
  • Scavone-Junior, Helio; University of São Paulo City. Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics. São Paulo. BR
  • Ferreira, Rívea Inês; University of São Paulo City. Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics. São Paulo. BR
Braz. oral res ; 25(4): 324-330, July-Aug. 2011. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-595852
ABSTRACT
To achieve proper recontouring of anterior and posterior teeth, to obtain optimal morphology during enamel stripping, it is important to be aware of dental anatomy. This study aimed at evaluating crown dimensions and proximal enamel thickness in a sample of 40 extracted sound, human, mandibular, second bicuspids (20 right and 20 left). Mesiodistal, cervico-occlusal and buccolingual crown dimensions were measured using a digital caliper, accurate to 0.01 mm. Teeth were embedded in acrylic resin and cut along their long axes through the proximal surfaces to obtain 0.7 mm-thick central sections. Enamel thickness on the cut sections was measured using a perfilometer. Comparative analyses were carried out using the Student's-t test (α= 5 percent). The mean mesiodistal crown widths for right and left teeth were 7.79 mm (± 0.47) and 7.70 mm (± 0.51), respectively. Mean cervico-occlusal heights ranged from 8.31 mm (± 0.75) on the right to 8.38 mm (± 0.85) on the left teeth. The mean values for the buccolingual dimension were 8.67 mm (± 0.70) on the right and 8.65 mm (± 0.54) on the left teeth. The mean enamel thickness on the mesial surfaces ranged from 1.35 mm (± 0.22) to 1.40 mm (± 0.17), on the left and right sides, respectively. On the distal surfaces, the corresponding values were 1.44 mm (± 0.21) and 1.46 mm (± 0.12). No significant differences were found between measurements for right and left teeth. However, enamel thickness was significantly greater on the distal surfaces, compared with the mesial surfaces.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Bicuspid / Tooth Crown / Dental Enamel Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. oral res Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2011 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of São Paulo City/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Bicuspid / Tooth Crown / Dental Enamel Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. oral res Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2011 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of São Paulo City/BR