Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient positioning during digital rectal examination of the prostate: preferences, tolerability, and results
Romero, Frederico R; Romero, Antonio W; Tambara Filho, Renato; Brenny Filho, Thadeu; Oliveira Júnior, Fernando Cesar de.
  • Romero, Frederico R; Instituto Curitiba de Saúde. Universidade Federal do Paraná. BR
  • Romero, Antonio W; Instituto Curitiba de Saúde. Universidade Federal do Paraná. BR
  • Tambara Filho, Renato; Instituto Curitiba de Saúde. Universidade Federal do Paraná. BR
  • Brenny Filho, Thadeu; Instituto Curitiba de Saúde. Universidade Federal do Paraná. BR
  • Oliveira Júnior, Fernando Cesar de; Instituto Curitiba de Saúde. Universidade Federal do Paraná. BR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 37(3): 371-379, May-June 2011. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-596012
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the preferred position used by Brazilian Urologists to perform DRE, the position that Brazilian patients prefer or think it is less embarrassing to have a DRE, and to evaluate the results of DRE with patients in left lateral decubitus, modified lithotomy, standing-up, or the physician will have them place their elbows on the table and squat down slightly. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Brazilian Urologists were contacted by e-mail, and 200 patients answered a questionnaire while undergoing prostate cancer screening.

RESULTS:

The preferred position was modified lithotomy position reported by 63.4 percent of Urologists, and left lateral position reported by 42.7 percent of the patients. Total DRE time was lower in the standing-up position. Pain and urinary urgency scores were similar regardless of the position used, and bowel urgency score was higher in patients squatting down. Patients were similar in terms of age and PSA level, but there was a significant difference between the standard deviations of estimated prostate weight in left lateral position. There were no differences in prostate asymmetry, positive DRE, or incomplete palpation of the prostate rates among different examination positions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite individual subjective preferences, a faster examination time in the standing-up position, and higher bowel urgency scores in patients with their elbows placed on the table and squatting down slightly, there were similar rates of prostate asymmetry, positive DRE, and incomplete palpation of the prostate, and comparable patient tolerability among different examination techniques.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prostate / Digital Rectal Examination / Patient Positioning / Patient Preference Limits: Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2011 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Instituto Curitiba de Saúde/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prostate / Digital Rectal Examination / Patient Positioning / Patient Preference Limits: Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2011 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Instituto Curitiba de Saúde/BR