Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validación del Cuestionario de Maltrato entre Iguales por Abuso de Poder (MIAP) para escolares / A self administered survey to assess bullying in schools
Lecannelier, Felipe; Varela, Jorge; Rodríguez, Jorge; Hoffmann, Marianela; Flores, Fernanda; Ascanio, Lorena.
  • Lecannelier, Felipe; Universidad del Desarrollo. Facultad de Psicología. Centro de Estudios Evolutivos e Intervención en el Niño. CL
  • Varela, Jorge; Universidad del Desarrollo. Facultad de Psicología. Centro de Estudios Evolutivos e Intervención en el Niño. CL
  • Rodríguez, Jorge; Universidad del Desarrollo. Facultad de Psicología. Centro de Estudios Evolutivos e Intervención en el Niño. CL
  • Hoffmann, Marianela; Universidad del Desarrollo. Facultad de Psicología. Centro de Estudios Evolutivos e Intervención en el Niño. CL
  • Flores, Fernanda; Universidad del Desarrollo. Facultad de Psicología. Centro de Estudios Evolutivos e Intervención en el Niño. CL
  • Ascanio, Lorena; Universidad del Desarrollo. Facultad de Psicología. Centro de Estudios Evolutivos e Intervención en el Niño. CL
Rev. méd. Chile ; 139(4): 474-479, abr. 2011. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-597643
ABSTRACT

Background:

Bullying is common in schools and has negative consequences. It can be assessed using a self-reported instrument.

Aim:

To validate a Spanish self-reporting tool called “Survey of High School Bullying Abuse of Power” (MIAP). Material and

Methods:

The instrument has 13 questions, of which 7 are multiple choice, rende-ring a total of 49 items. It was applied to 2.341 children of seventh and eighth grade attending private, subsidized and municipal schools in the city of Concepción, Chile. Expert judge analysis and estimated reliability using the Cronbach Alpha were used to validate the survey.

Results:

The instrument obtained a Cronbach Alpha coeffcient of 0.8892, classifed as good. This analysis generated four scales that explained 30.9 percent of the variance. They were called “Witness Bullying” with 18 items, accounting for 11.4 percent of the variance, “Bullying Victim” with 12 items, accounting for 7.5 percent of the variance, “Bullying Perpetrator and Severe bullying Victim”, with 10 items explaining 6.4 percent of the variance and “Aggressor Bullying” with 6 items accounting for 5.7 percent of the variance.

Conclusions:

The MIAP can recognize four basic factors that facilitate the analysis and understanding of bullying, with good levels of reliability and validity. The remaining questions also deliver valuable information.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Self-Assessment / Students / Bullying Type of study: Observational study / Prevalence study / Qualitative research / Risk factors Limits: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: South America / Chile Language: Spanish Journal: Rev. méd. Chile Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2011 Type: Article Affiliation country: Chile Institution/Affiliation country: Universidad del Desarrollo/CL

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Self-Assessment / Students / Bullying Type of study: Observational study / Prevalence study / Qualitative research / Risk factors Limits: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: South America / Chile Language: Spanish Journal: Rev. méd. Chile Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2011 Type: Article Affiliation country: Chile Institution/Affiliation country: Universidad del Desarrollo/CL