Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of a nanoparticle composite resin
Schmitt, Vera Lucia; Puppin-Rontani, Regina Maria; Naufel, Fabiana Scarparo; Ludwig, Danielle; Ueda, Julio Katuhide; Correr Sobrinho, Lorenço.
  • Schmitt, Vera Lucia; Paraná West State University. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Curitiba. BR
  • Puppin-Rontani, Regina Maria; State University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Dental Materials Division. Piracicaba. BR
  • Naufel, Fabiana Scarparo; Paraná West State University. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Curitiba. BR
  • Ludwig, Danielle; Paraná West State University. Curitiba. BR
  • Ueda, Julio Katuhide; Paraná West State University. Department of Restorative Dentistry. BR
  • Correr Sobrinho, Lorenço; State University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Dental Materials Division. Piracicaba. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 10(2): 105-108, Apr.-June 2011. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-599382
ABSTRACT
To evaluate the surface roughness of the resin Filtek Z350 (3M ESPE) after different finishing and polishing techniques.

Methods:

Sixty specimens of 7x2 mm were made and distributed in 6 groups (n=10), according to the technique employed G1 (control) – polyester strip – no finishing or polishing; G2- multi-blade burs; G3- diamond burs 3195F and 3195FF; G4- Diamond ProDiscs (FGM); G5- Sof-Lex Discs (3M ESPE); G6- Robinson bristle brushes with pumice paste for20 s and felt disc with 2-4 ìm diamond paste for 30 s. The specimens were stored in artificial saliva at 37°C for 7 days. After the finishing and polishing techniques, surface roughness (Ra, ìm) was measured using Surf-Corder profilometer SE 1700. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA andTukey’s test at 5% significance level.

Results:

G3 presented the highest surface roughness meanvalue (0.61). G5 presented the lowest surface roughness mean value (0.15), but it was not significantly different from G1, G4 and G6.

Conclusions:

According to the obtained results, Z350 composite resin presented the lowest surface roughness when finishing and polishing systems were used (Sof-lex and Diamond Pro discs and Robinson bristle brush with pumice plus Diamond®felt disc with Diamond Excel® paste). The use of diamond burs (G3) resulted in the highest composite surface roughness. There was no significantly different between G1, G4, G5 and G6.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Composite Resins / Nanotechnology / Dental Polishing Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2011 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Paraná West State University/BR / State University of Campinas/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Composite Resins / Nanotechnology / Dental Polishing Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2011 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Paraná West State University/BR / State University of Campinas/BR