Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Direct fluorescent antibody assay and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis
Nishiwaki-Dantas, Maria Cristina; Abreu, Mariza Toledo de; Melo, Cynthia Mendonça de; Romero, Ivana Lopes; Matos Neto, Rubens Belfort; Dantas, Paulo Elias Correa.
Affiliation
  • Nishiwaki-Dantas, Maria Cristina; Santa Casa of São Paulo. Corneal and External Disease Service. Department of Ophthalmology. BR
  • Abreu, Mariza Toledo de; Federal University of São Paulo. Department of Ophthalmology. BR
  • Melo, Cynthia Mendonça de; Santa Casa of São Paulo. Corneal and External Disease Service. Department of Ophthalmology. BR
  • Romero, Ivana Lopes; Santa Casa of São Paulo. Corneal and External Disease Service. Department of Ophthalmology. BR
  • Matos Neto, Rubens Belfort; Federal University of São Paulo. Department of Ophthalmology. BR
  • Dantas, Paulo Elias Correa; Santa Casa of São Paulo. Corneal and External Disease Service. Department of Ophthalmology. BR
Clinics ; Clinics;66(12): 2013-2018, 2011. ilus, tab
Article in En | LILACS | ID: lil-608995
Responsible library: BR1.1
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To identify Chlamydia trachomatis via polymerase chain reaction and a direct fluorescent antibodyassay in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis while comparing the efficacies of both tests for detectingChlamydia trachomatis in these conditions.

METHODS:

Conjunctival scraping samples were obtained from 177 patients who were divided into two groups avernal keratoconjunctivitis group (group A) and a control group (group B). The polymerase chain reaction and adirect fluorescent antibody assay were performed. Sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves,and areas under the curve were calculated for both tests in groups A and B. Receiver operating characteristic curveswere plotted using a categorical variable with only two possible outcomes (positive and negative).

RESULTS:

Statistical analysis revealed a significant association between vernal keratoconjunctivitis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection detected by a direct fluorescent antibody assay with high sensitivity and specificity. Allpatients in group A with positive polymerase chain reactions also presented with positive direct fluorescentantibody assays.

CONCLUSION:

The association between vernal keratoconjunctivitis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection wasconfirmed by positive direct fluorescent antibody assays in 49.4 percent of vernal keratoconjunctivitis patients and bypositive polymerase chain reactions in 20 percent of these patients. The direct fluorescent antibody assay detectedChlamydia trachomatis in a higher number of patients than did the polymerase chain reaction. Although thediagnosis of trachoma is essentially clinical, the disease may not be detected in vernal keratoconjunctivitis patients.Due to the high frequency of chlamydial infection detected in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis, we suggestconsidering routine laboratory tests to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in patients with severe and refractory allergicdisease.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Conjunctivitis, Allergic / Chlamydia Infections / Chlamydia trachomatis Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Clinics Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2011 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Conjunctivitis, Allergic / Chlamydia Infections / Chlamydia trachomatis Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Clinics Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2011 Type: Article