Apendicectomía laparoscópica versus abierta: comparables / Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy: comparable
Rev. colomb. cir
;
27(2): 121-128, abr. 2012. tab
Article
in Spanish
| LILACS
| ID: lil-650049
RESUMEN
Se presenta un estudio restrospectivo observacional de dos cohortes obtenidas en cuatro años, con un total de 215 pacientes, 92 para apendicectomía laparoscópica y 123 para apendicectomía convencional, comparando variables como estancia hospitalaria, tiempo quirúrgico, complicaciones y dolor posoperatorio, entre otras. Se halló mayor frecuencia de complicaciones en la apendicectomía tradicional y mayor incidencia de infección del sitio operatorio (p<0,05).
ABSTRACT
Retrospective observational study of two cohorts of patients in a period of time of 4 years, with a total of 215 patients, 92 operated by laparoscopy and 123 open was completef at our hospital.. Length of stay, operating room times, postoperative complications, and other items were compared. The results show a higher rate of complications in open appendectomy with a clearly higher incidence of superficial wound infection (p < 0,05).
Full text:
Available
Index:
LILACS (Americas)
Main subject:
Appendectomy
Type of study:
Observational study
Language:
Spanish
Journal:
Rev. colomb. cir
Journal subject:
General Surgery
Year:
2012
Type:
Article
Affiliation country:
Colombia
Institution/Affiliation country:
Fundación Cardioinfantil/CO
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS