Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A methodology to standardize the evaluation of root canal instrumentation using cone beam computed tomography
Flores, Cláudia Bohrer; Machado, Patrícia; Montagner, Francisco; Gomes, Brenda Paula Figueiredo de Almeida; Dotto, Gustavo Nogara; Schmitz, Marcia da Silva.
  • Flores, Cláudia Bohrer; Federal University of Santa Maria. Santa Maria. BR
  • Machado, Patrícia; Federal University of Santa Maria. Santa Maria. BR
  • Montagner, Francisco; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Department of Conservative Dentistry. Endodontic Division. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Gomes, Brenda Paula Figueiredo de Almeida; University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Conservative Dentistry. Piracicaba. BR
  • Dotto, Gustavo Nogara; Federal University of Santa Maria. Department of Stomatology. Endodontic Division. Santa Maria. BR
  • Schmitz, Marcia da Silva; Federal University of Santa Maria. Department of Stomatology. Endodontic Division. Santa Maria. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 11(2): 84-87, abr.-jun. 2012. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-654825
ABSTRACT
The evaluation of root canal instrumentation is important to observe the action of endodontic instrumentsin the root canal walls.

Aim:

This study introduces a method to standardize the acquisition of imagesbefore and after preparing root canals by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods:

Sixteen mandibular molars were included in acrylic resin blocks. Samples were inserted in a stablewood box, which was filled with plaster and served as a guide to reinsert the samples. The apparatuswas used for the CBCT examination before and after cervical flaring of root canals. The softwareIcatVision® was used to equalize the images before and after instrumentation with two computersoperating at the same time. The measurements between root canal center and the furcation areawere determined. The statistical analysis was performed using the t-test for paired samples (á=0.05).

Results:

The values for dentin thickness in the risk zone before and after root canal flaring withGates-Gliden drills were 1.096 (± 0.27) mm and 0.742 (± 0.24) (p<0.01), respectively.

Conclusions:

The proposed method assures the same positioning of the samples before and after root canalpreparation. It is extremely important, as any mesiodistal or buccolingual movement can producea different topogram for comparison procedures.
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Anatomy, Cross-Sectional / Endodontics / Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2012 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul/BR / Federal University of Santa Maria/BR / University of Campinas/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Anatomy, Cross-Sectional / Endodontics / Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2012 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul/BR / Federal University of Santa Maria/BR / University of Campinas/BR