Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
Haddad, Marcela Filié; Goiato, Marcelo Coelho; Santos, Daniela Micheline dos; Crepaldi, Nádia de Marchi; Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves; Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina.
  • Haddad, Marcela Filié; Univ Estadual Paulista. Araçatuba Dental School. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics. Araçatuba. BR
  • Goiato, Marcelo Coelho; Univ Estadual Paulista. Araçatuba Dental School. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics. Araçatuba. BR
  • Santos, Daniela Micheline dos; Univ Estadual Paulista. Araçatuba Dental School. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics. Araçatuba. BR
  • Crepaldi, Nádia de Marchi; Univ Estadual Paulista. Araçatuba Dental School. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics. Araçatuba. BR
  • Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves; Univ Estadual Paulista. Araçatuba Dental School. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics. Araçatuba. BR
  • Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina; Univ Estadual Paulista. Araçatuba Dental School. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics. Araçatuba. BR
J. appl. oral sci ; 20(6): 649-654, Nov.-Dec. 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-660636
ABSTRACT
The development of implant dentistry improved the possibilities of rehabilitation with maxillofacial prosthesis. However, clinically it is difficult to bond the silicone to the attachment system.

OBJECTIVES:

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an adhesive system on the bond strength between acrylic resin and facial silicone. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

A total of 120 samples were fabricated with auto-polymerized acrylic resin and MDX 4-4210 facial silicone. Both materials were bonded through mechanical retentions and/or application of primers (DC 1205 primer and Sofreliner primer S) and adhesive (Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A) or not (control group). Samples were divided into 12 groups according to the method used to attach the silicone to the acrylic resin. All samples were subjected to a T-peel test in a universal testing machine. Failures were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed. The data were evaluated by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test (α=.05).

RESULTS:

The highest bond strength values (5.95 N/mm; 3.07 N/mm; 4.75 N/mm) were recorded for the samples that received a Sofreliner primer application. These values were significantly higher when the samples had no scratches and did not receive the application of Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A.

CONCLUSIONS:

The most common type of failure was adhesive. The use of Sofreliner primer increased the bond strength between the auto-polymerized acrylic resin and the Silastic MDX 4-4210 facial silicone.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Silicone Elastomers / Acrylic Resins / Adhesives / Dental Bonding / Maxillofacial Prosthesis Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2012 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Univ Estadual Paulista/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Silicone Elastomers / Acrylic Resins / Adhesives / Dental Bonding / Maxillofacial Prosthesis Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2012 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Univ Estadual Paulista/BR