Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cochlear implants and bacterial meningitis: A speech recognition study in paired samples
Brito, Rubens de; Bittencourt, Aline Gomes; Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valéria; Magalhães, Ana Tereza; Samuel, Paola; Tsuji, Robinson Koji; Bento, Ricardo Ferreira.
  • Brito, Rubens de; University of São Paulo. School of Medicine. Department of Otolaryngology. São Paulo. BR
  • Bittencourt, Aline Gomes; University of São Paulo. School of Medicine. Department of Otolaryngology. São Paulo. BR
  • Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valéria; University of São Paulo. School of Medicine. Department of Otolaryngology. São Paulo. BR
  • Magalhães, Ana Tereza; University of São Paulo. School of Medicine. Department of Otolaryngology. São Paulo. BR
  • Samuel, Paola; University of São Paulo. School of Medicine. Department of Otolaryngology. São Paulo. BR
  • Tsuji, Robinson Koji; University of São Paulo. School of Medicine. Department of Otolaryngology. São Paulo. BR
  • Bento, Ricardo Ferreira; University of São Paulo. Scholl of Medicine. Department of Otolaryngology. São Paulo. BR
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 17(1): 57-61, Jan.-Mar. 2013. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-662527
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Cochlear implants may guarantee sound perception and the ability to detect speech at a close-to-normal hearing intensity; however, differences have been observed among implantees in terms of performance on discrimination tests and speech recognition.

Objective:

To identify whether patients with post-meningitis deafness perform similarly to patients with hearing loss due to other causes.

Method:

A retrospective clinical study involving post-lingual patients who had been using Nucleus-22 or Nucleus-24 cochlear implants for at least 1 year. These patients were matched with respect to age (± 2 years), time since the onset of deafness (± 1 year), and the duration of implant use with implant users who had hearing loss due to other causes. Speech perception was assessed using the Portuguese version of the Latin-American Protocol for the Evaluation of Cochlear Implants.

Results:

The sample consisted of 52 individuals (26 in each of the 2 groups). The post-meningitic group had a median of 18.5 active electrodes. The group with hearing loss due to other causes had a median of 21, but no significant statistical difference was observed (p = 0.07). The results of closed- and open-set speech recognition tests showed great variability in speech recognition between the studied groups. These differences were more pronounced for the most difficult listening tasks, such as the medial consonant task (in the vowel-consonant-vowel format).

Conclusion:

Cochlear implant recipients with hearing loss due to bacterial meningitis, who had been using the device for 1 year performed more poorly on closed- and open-set speech recognition tests than did implant recipients with hearing loss due to other causes...
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prognosis / Speech Perception / Retrospective Studies / Cochlear Implants / Meningitis, Bacterial / Hearing Loss Type of study: Practice guideline / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2013 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Prognosis / Speech Perception / Retrospective Studies / Cochlear Implants / Meningitis, Bacterial / Hearing Loss Type of study: Practice guideline / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2013 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of São Paulo/BR